Search results

That faulty thinking is based on the old false Jewish tradition that a person doesn't exist until they are made flesh. The actual truth of the matter is that we, our person, is not of the flesh at all! The spirit part returning back to God upon death of the flesh per Eccl.12:5-7 includes our...

Antiochus IV served only as 'type' for the final Antichrist. Just the fact that Jesus warned of the "abomination of desolation" event from Daniel 11:31 about 200 years AFTER Antiochus IV had been dead, is proof that the role of the "vile person" is actually about the final Antichrist that's to...

So far in this thread, we see the vain attempt by Preterists (and Historicists) to rewrite Bible prophecy about the Daniel 9:27 event which is outlined also in the Daniel 8:9-14 verses about the symbolic "little horn", in Daniel 11:21-39 about the "vile person" who places the "abomination of...

Nope, you cannot use that Scripture as an example of what is said in the Daniel 9:27 verse. Those are 2 different subjects. The subject in Daniel 9:27 is about a false one ending the sacrifices in Jerusalem and placing an idol abomination in its stead. If you say that was Lord Jesus who did...

I haven't seen that much of a difference between the two. Both do a play on trying to make 70 A.D. to represent the end of this world in prophecy like you did in your prior post.

That statement makes about as much sense as a three day drunk who has just learned some English composition. It has absolutely nothing to do with Biblical understanding. Christ's Book of Revelation is not just some poetic novel. It is The Word of God, and a Christian should treat it that way...

Already you have identified your thinking with the false Preterist doctrines of men just by doing that play on the word "age". The Joel 2 Scripture is about events leading up to the "day of the Lord" which IS... the FINAL DAY of this present world. Now to mark just what the 'end of this...

If "animated mud" is all we are, then it would mean we have no soul which continues after flesh death that Jesus spoke of (Matthew 10:28). I think I'll listen to my Lord Jesus instead of men's doctrines like yours.

There you go again, accusing others of the very thing YOU yourself are guilty of! By Preterists like yourself who refuse to cover the Daniel Scripture I have shown as evidence against your doctrine of men, you do MASTER CHERRY PICKIN' & GRININ'.

The idea of a confirming a covenant in Daniel 9:27 is about confirming the 'old covenant', NOT the New Covenant. The manuscript word "confirm" means 'to prevail, or make strong' (Strong's no.1396). And since it then speaks of the daily sacrifices being ended and false idol worship setup instead...

@pompadour is right in quoting from the end of Joel 2 about dreams and visions at the end of this world. The difference with that video is that I didn't hear ANY claim that God was speaking to him as a prophet, like Moses nor anyone else like Moses. God does... communicate through dreams, even...

Then you are disagreeing with Lord Jesus, because He meant what He said there. His kingdom is NOT of this world (meaning this present world). And I have shown already enough Scripture that proves... that is exactly what He meant!

Sorry, but God (including Lord Jesus), has ordained those kingdoms to Satan for THIS world, and that is not going to change until our Lord Jesus returns at the 2nd coming. Does God's Word show this as fact? YES! Right here for one example... Rev 11:15 15 And the seventh angel sounded; and there...

No, no, no, you cannot just do a play on the word 'confirm' from Daniel 9:27 like that, the idea of confirming in those other Scriptures is in DIFFERENT CONTEXTS. In the Daniel 9:27 verse, it is NOT Jesus that is doing the confirming of the covenant, it is the same one who does the abomination...

Well, then maybe you ought to consider leaving the political correctness world views you've been taught that is just an act of playing it safe. One who stands up for what God's Word actually teaches, as written, is not going to be popular in this day and time. Sounds to me you're not used to...

You're very funny! What you accuse is exactly... what YOU are guilty of!!! LOL! Push propaganda much? Anyone, even a little child, can understand the meaning of the 1st beast of Rev.13:1 that comes out of the 'sea', because it is explained in Rev.17: Rev 17:1 17:1 And there came one of the...

Here's is what destroys men's doctrines that wrongly assumes the working of the "vile person" in Daniel 11 was fulfilled history: Matt 24:15 15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him...

No, the 1st beast of Rev.13 is a beast kingdom, not a person. We know this because that 1st beast has ten horns (which are 10 kings), and seven heads (which are seven mountains), and ten crowns (which are ten powers, the ten kings have). But the 2nd beast of Rev.13:11 forward IS THE ANTICHRIST...

FYI for brethren on the forum. Those on man's doctrines of Preterism try to hide the events of Daniel 11 about the "vile person" in relation to the Daniel 9:27 events, and that's why they would deny the connection of the "league" made in Dan.11:23 with the "vile person" to the confirming (make...

How can you just skip... right over these verses I posted about the "league" the "vile person" makes? Dan 11:21-23 21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries. 22...