Search results

No. No rationalization that means he was God. He was not God and that is why he was given authority, by the Creator, his God and our Father. And this is explained explicitly below. Note the juxtaposition of God (not "the Father" but God - in his unitarian nature) from Jesus, only the case...

Circular reasoning. If they backslid, then they were never born again to begin with.

So, what are your thoughts on Psalm 110:1 - in any translation you prefer.

Scripture says over and over again, not that he became a man, but that he IS a man. Even if men become men, it does not men they are God. How come you cannot understand that?

Not one time does Scripture tell us Jesus is the Creator. A simple way to know is that trinitarians attempt to impose their doctrine onto unitarian text. That is, there is always a valid way to interpret Scritpture that undermines the inherently contradictory doctrine. And always keep in mind...

I know. Rather than take a gander at v15, he re-quoted v14, saying it was clear enough for him. Talk about Willful Ignorance!

I do dream on. It makes life so much more fun. :D

I'm OK with that. Someone else pointed out that they agree and disagree with me on this point. It's too ambivalent for me. LOL

Oy vey! I am surprised at how literally you are taking this verse. "I never knew you" cannot literally apply to an all knowing deity. Obviously, these miracles were performed by God's power through Christ's name. It's just that the conduit of God's grace also backslid, failing to do the will of...

Dear AJ, no one is taking credit for this miracle. And I know your religion prohibits recognizing modern day miracles - even though they happen all the time. Aren't we his temple?

Dear AJ, you want answers. This is your Achilles Heel, your idol of knowledge shows itself again. The Bible teaches faith over knowledge time and again. You don't want to hear this. From today's Devotional Reading: 12 Now all we can see of God is like a cloudy picture in a mirror. Later we...

Ye of little faith. God who is in control of all things and even counts the hair on our head is not involved this miracle?! Come on now. Isaiah 45:6-7. Luke 12:7 "No" is an answer to a prayer. We don't often rejoice immediately when God says no but we usually rejoice right away when the...

If I can find out about this, I'll let you know.

He was not at the brink. He was dead.

LOL. No. But I did answer your question. Did you read the article about the double split experiment defying logic?

And then you do not even copy and paste v15 but paste v14 again? Sad.

My point is the converse. My point is NOT that titles are not capitalized. My point is that just because something is capitalized does not make it a title. MAGA. FIFO. I have a HOT date tonight. I grew up in Boston.

Repeating it does not make it true. Jesus' God is THE savior while Jesus is our savior. Agency. What game is this? I specifically asked for your thoughts on Psalm 110:1 - in any translation you prefer.

No. According to the insight gained from answering my question. It's amazing how trinitarians cannot answer simple questions or explain verses that do not fit their doctrine.

1st, not an answer to my challenge. 2nd, Jesus is not referenced in the verse referring to a child called Father. We went over how wrong you are to use this as "support" given the entire NT does not identify Jesus as Father one time. Now, please construct a stronger anti-trinitarian statement...