Search results

I nominate this post for the most illogical post of all time. Appeal To Ignorance. I do not suppose. That you come to a conclusion based on the lack of evidence is profoundly illogical. Why do you not accept Jesus' explicit words that he has a God who is the only true God?

I eagerly await another erudite reply. :D

Yes it does. You are pretending the idea of backsliding does not and cannot exist, which is the fundamental flaw of OSAS.

Untrue. I showed the historical record. Not in Matthew's concluding verses.

No Scripture limits Jesus 'in his humanity' to being the son of God.

Not once does the Bible say Jesus is God or the LORD. Not once. No question, IS 43:1 is referring to YHWH, not Jesus. So, not sure why you keep referencing it.

I don't care about vowels. The point is God, YHWH, is not Yeshua. Translating all this into English; the point is God, Jehovah, is not Jesus.

I do have proof. You just don't want to accept it. The proof is in this form: P1. At the end of a book (Matthew), a profoundly significant statement is made inconsistent with what was said up until that point. (This alone is suspicious.) P2. Other books (Acts, Romans, Corinthians, Galatians)...

So simple. So insightful. Thanks!

That's what it's come down to; placement of vowels? That's the big picture point, not that God's personal name was removed from Scripture 7,000 times?!

What verse is it that God said this? Ex 3:14. Did you ever take a gander at the next verse?

It's just another application of the concept and principle of Agency. All prophets speak God's words. We also have the capacity to speak God's divine words. Just because we repeat these words, it does not make us God. Given that God is the source of all things, it stand to reason that he is THE...

Everything implies he was born again.

Well, to refine your question, the claim involves achieving simultaneously, mutually exclusive conditions. I am simultaneously achieving many inclusive things 100%: husband, father, grandfather, neighbor, cousin, brother, son, boss, subordinate, etc. In another thread, I pointed out that...

Indeed I do think Matt 28:19 was added by a heretic, a trinitarian heretic. Was Matthew 28:19 Added To The Bible But the point is explaining why the Why The Apostles Repeatedly Disobeyed the Risen Lord IF it were true? I think an objective person has to conclude it peculiar.

My point is your claim is debunked by this story. People saved (born again) continue to sin.

Some months ago I was blessed to report a miracle at my church. Miracle At My Church I am blessed to report another miracle. My church has been led by the same family for 4 decades. Now, the 2nd generation has taken over. The youngest son is the lead Pastor. The daughter is the Executive...

I'm not so sure he said that. Why The Apostles Repeatedly Disobeyed the Risen Lord

Yes, Since Jesus' God is THE Savior, mutual exclusivity means Jesus is not. Jesus is my Savior but not God. Hey, did you ever answer my question(s)? What is your take on Ps 110:1 using any translation you prefer?

Hmmm. A review of the exchange ... Aren't you changing the subject from a born again person sinning to who they sin against? Again, it's a change in subject. IF people born again cannot sin, why did Paul tell the Corinthians to shun the man sleeping with his mother-in-law?