Search results

Ah, no trap questions please. You're not going to prove anything by that route. I showed you enough Old Testament Scripture from Ezekiel 37 that is 'very'... specific, that God in final is going to gather the literal seed of both the "house of Israel" and the "house of Judah" back to the lands...

Nah, that's just what you've been taught by the deceived who don't really understand what the devil originally did in the time of old. If you keep studying God's Word 'for yourself' with His help, you'll come to understand what started all rebellion against God, tied to the devil who sinned from...

From the devil, like 1 John 3:8 reveals. You already know that sin produces death, so who was given the power of death? The Devil, but why? Because he was actually the very first that sinned against God in coveting His throne. And that happened prior to Adam and Eve in God's Garden. By the time...

No, it's not false. Thanks for letting us all know the agenda you've come here with, whether you are deceived and just don't know any better, or whether you do.

There's actual genetics, and then there's pseudo-genetics ideas pushed by those on the false theory of evolution. Each must make their choice who they're going to listen to. The fact that God said at the start in Genesis about His creation of living beings each after their 'kind', and made one...

See Romans 9 where Apostle Paul was talking about the idea of the Gentile believer being counted as spiritual Israel. But God said He will gather both the house of Israel and the house of Judah in final, and join them together, back to the lands of promise He gave their fathers. That has...

I'm pretty sure I just explained it, which actually blows your theory that kind does not produce kind.

Paul's meaning in Romans 2:28-29 is about a 'spiritual Israelite', like the example he gave later in Romans 9 about the believing Gentile. This is also the same kind of idea Paul declared in Ephesians 2 about the believing Gentile have come nigh to the promises and covenants via Christ, and...

It's not chance that Wescott and Hort pushed a corrupt text for later Bible translations. Westcott and Hort's Greek Text

The actual word Apostle Paul used means a Judean, not necessarily one born of the tribe of Judah. And the time reference is important... Acts 21:39 39 But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto...

This is the real point, corrupt Alexandrian texts that Wescott & Hort pushed in 1881 as being more accurate than the Textus Receptus, simply because the Alexandrian texts were older. This is the reason why there are so many Scriptures in the KJV (Textus Receptus for the NT) missing in the NIV...

I understand your point, but if your interpretation of the "house of Israel" phrase were true, then it would mean there's no need for prophecy at the end to be fulfilled that was given specifically to the "house of Israel". So in essence, that would be to destroy what God has already promised to...

No, actually I am not doing any such thing. I recall a German woman at one time gave birth to twins, but the difference was one child was white and the other child was Black. That didn't happen because of one paternal father. It happened because of more than one father. It's called...

The whole Bible was written to the Christian Church... Heb 10:7 7 Then said I, Lo, I come (in the volume of the book it is written of Me,) to do Thy will, O God. KJV Rom 15:4 4 For whatsoever things were written aforetime were written for our learning, that we through patience and comfort of...

Later New Testament translations are from the Alexandrian texts that Wescott & Hort presented as being older and more reliable than the Textus Receptus that the KJV used. In reality, the Alexandrian texts contain corruptions from Gnosticism, as the early Christian school at Alexandria, Egypt was...

The sin 'nature' idea is a product of modern Bible translations. The KJV is more detailed... Rom 7:17-18 17 Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. 18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to...

In case you missed it, in my post I gave direct Bible evidence that the throne of David promised to Jesus will be on this earth, and Jesus will inherit it only in that "regeneration" of Matthew 19:28 which is also when His 12 Apostles will each sit upon a throne over the 12 tribes of Israel in...

Your argument is the red herring. Kind begats kind, that is what God's Word teaches. "Can the Ethiopian change his skin, or the leopard his spots?" (Jer.13:23).

The erroneous idea of the resurrection involving a flesh body is a an old Jewish tradition. In 1 Cor.15 Apostle Paul said that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God. Procreation is of the flesh order of this world, not the world to come.

Evolution theory denies the existence of different races. That's why you guys would love to even destroy the word 'race' if you could. An Oriental and a Caucasian will not produce a Black offspring. Thus the proof of the existence of different races of man is obvious.