Search results

once again, I am not playing your games been there with you. Explain why there is sin during the reign of Christ in Jerusalem. If you can not. let me know and I will move on. I refuse to get into another useless conversation with you.

Zach 14 and Is 4 prove my point 16 And it shall come to pass that everyone who is left of all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall go up from year to year to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, and to keep the Feast of Tabernacles. 17 And it shall be that whichever of the families...

Then try to explain it to me. I keep hearing you tell me I am wrong. but I do not hear how you can see Johns words a different way. I disagree. we just have to look at the passage. and you need to explain what John said in the passage. I have been a part of many a debate. I have actually...

Look at the passage I quoted and speak on it. I have had this conversation with you before. I will not go down your rebbut trail of refusing to look at the passages in question and just stating your belief and throwing a bunch of verses in my face that has nothing to do with the passage I spoke...

Amen thats why we need to be like CHrist. and give them the good news not judge them. Until they are saved. they are slaved to their sin. judging their singular person sin has never caused a person to repent.

let he who has no sin cast the first stone

He still died for them sorry bro. But you just wrong here.

so I guess jesus did not love us while we were yet sinners?? or he loved our sin?

yet Jesus said whoever endures to the end will be saved. Only those who have recieved the mark will be killed. Those who do not and endure will enter the kingdom Age with Jesus where he will gather the Elect. seperate the nations. and rule from Jerusalem. Even punishing the nations who do not...

it can be a bit confusing.. Forgive me

the problem with this is in areas of question. such as this, Just because you think we are out of line because we believe in premill does not mean you can use that passage to rebuke us.. Not does it give us the right to rebuke you Sadly to many people use this passage to rebuke people merely...

yes, it is completely out of line.. I agree

like I said, I can not see who you are responding to. I probably have her on ignore.. His second coming IS the end of the age, if that is what you are asking. Jesus made that clean in Matt 24..

How could we read it any other way. I am not sure again why I would need another scripture it makes no sense. Either John meant what he said, or he does not.. I agree, it is not the only passage, but we are speaking of this one passage. How could you interpret it any other way without changing...

Not sure who this is directed to. I think Jesus gave us the answer No one knows. not even the son of man.

good God I hope no one is doing that. This is not a salvation issue. the gospel is not when will the ressurection be or will God rull in the future or is he ruling now.. Its sad. Like I said this is my favorite subject (next to history) yet the most heated and hateful subject I have ever...

I am reminded of pauls words are you so FOOLISH having begun in the spirit (faith) are you now being perfected in the flesh (works)

not sure why he would need any other scripture why would we not just take what John said at his word? 1. those who died during this time of wrath will rule with christ for 1000 years 2. The rest will not be resurrected until the 1000 years are finished.

These arguments are sad. and uncalled for. it does not help anyone sadly. Anytime I have tried to enter a millenium type discussion. I see this from both sides.. Would be nice if we just discussed the word

dude, YOU WILL NEVER BE SAVED BY YOUR WORKS There is no different than saying works must precede, or if they must follow. Both arguments claim unless you work YOU WILL NOT BE SAVED Thats the problem with flawed doctrines. They come back to bite you. You may be able to convince yourself your...