Search results

Whew!! All that long post and you failed to grasp that the "great city" of Revelation 17 is not Rome... but Jerusalem for the very end. The Babylon Harlot of Revelation is a "great city" per the last verse of Revelation 17. And in Revelation 11 we are shown early which "great city" that is...

It goes with this Scripture... 1 Cor 10:13 13 There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man: but God is faithful, Who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able; but will with the temptation also make a way to escape, that ye may be able to bear it. KJV

Your OP question involves exactly what I've been revealing from God's Holy Writ. What God's Holy Writ says is much, much more important than anything you could ever say. This is what you stated earlier- amadeus said: "Possibly what we are looking for, [or should be], is a Bride that is taken...

And I say you are a HYPOCRITE, because in your previous posts you mocked me for revealing that the KJV translators put in the word Easter in Acts 14:2 when the actual Greek manuscript word is passover (pashca = always means passover). And now you ADMIT that the KJV translators used "Lucifer"...

Can't really agree that 'we' are the new Jerusalem. Instead, that is a city that our Heavenly Father and His Son have prepared for those who love Him.

You keep on believing that you are Jesus like they try to tell you. And you ought to read Scripture instead of listening to those hirelings... Rom 3:24-25 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation...

You are not listening (or reading in this case here). God was not really calling Satan the 'morning star', but was MOCKING Satan because of Satan wanting to be GOD. It is IMPOSSIBLE for anyone else besides Jesus Christ to be The Morning Star. Any true... Christian automatically knows that from...

That's right. The actual Hebrew word in the manuscripts is 'heylel', which means 'morning star'. So why... did the KJV translators swap 'morning star' for "Lucifer" in Isaiah 14:12? The word Lucifer is NOT IN THE MANUSCRIPTS. This is why even other Bible versions have anything from 'O Day...

Sorry, but our Lord Jesus did not promise us that we would become our 'own' Christ. You still sin because of the flesh you live in, and you will continue to slip up until the day of His coming (Romans 7; 1 John 1). What you have succumbed to by such a belief is a philosophy of men, and not God's...

You simply do not understand analogy at all, do you? Because of that, you've obviously missed a LOT... of teaching from our LORD in His Word, because He uses analogy a lot! In Isaiah 14:12, God is QUOTING Satan, as Satan wants to be The GOD. Our Heavenly Father is using Satan's own words...

We'll see. But I only see God doing the judging into the future "lake of fire", which means destruction of one's soul. And that's what the end of Rev.20 shows. You referenced it in your post #95, and then quoted it in your post #221.

You are grossly deceived. Easter was a PAGAN FEAST. You need to do more research, or you can stay in ignorance like you're doing now. And if you don't know how the KJV translators substituted the word Easter for pascha in that Acts 12:4 Scripture, you'll probably go really nuts over the fact...

Yeah, you already quoted that Scripture once. It doesn't say where we judge them to. A judgement to perish by us is your addition to the Scripture. Each soul must appear before the Judgment Seat of Christ. (Romans 14:10) Rev 20:12 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and...

If you actually read what all I suggested then you would have understood about the Ezekiel 16 analogy of God having married Jerusalem, but she became a harlot. Same thing with the analogy in Isaiah 54 and Luke 23, you would have understood how the virgin and bride metaphor applied to Christ's...

I'd definitely be afraid to stand before our Lord Jesus with that attitude. Reason is, because it means you believe you can't sin anymore while in this flesh when you will do exactly that, even when trying your best not to! And it means cutting off a walk with Jesus. That means killing the...

EASTER (es'-ter) (pascha, from Aramaic paccha' and Hebrew pecach, the Passover festival): The English word comes from the Anglo-Saxon Eastre or Estera, a Teutonic goddess to whom sacrifice was offered in April, so the name was transferred to the paschal feast. The word does not properly occur in...

Anyone can post what they like on Wikipedia. If you're trusting that website for your scholarship you're doing poor scholarship. Get yourself a descent New Testament Greek Lexicon. A Strong's Exhaustive Concordance would do. It's online too. My BibleSoft software comes with a Strong's and...

If you look a bit deeper, that's about the Millennial time of the future, the time when Christ's saints will reign with Him, with the rod of iron, over the nations. That is when the unsaved will stand in judgement. It is not the decision of who goes into the future "lake of fire" and who...

Sorry, but you're mistaken. Jesus does not 'directly' divinely intervene in everyone's life to cause them to 'know' Him. Since the days of His Apostles, there has been NO Church leader that Jesus revealed Himself directly to like He did with His Apostles and divinely intervening making their...

Man, big plus on the "some get bogged down and stuck in just one area of it through religious doctrines and cannot continue any further" idea!