Search results

Gerhard, your prejudice against SDA has blinded you to the point it has you manufacturing stories by deliberately misunderstanding.

LOL

This application of tongues is not for the public domain unless there is an interpreter but as i said in the previous post, check the account in Acts 2. I think it's self explanatory.

You need to check the account of the event you are commenting on. You'll find it in Acts 2. It tells us they were declaring the wonderful works of God. The context tells us it was the message of the death and resurrection of Jesus and the forgiveness of sins which they were sharing.

I wonder why Jesus never did that?

The message of the gospel is for men. It is spoken in mans language to man. In the case in point, the disciples where given the ability to speak in the language of other than their native tongue. The various visitors from different parts of the world heard them speaking the good news in their...

I think you have missed the point my dear. Your statement was that the miracle was in the hearing. If the mockers received the miracle of hearing it would not have been gibberish and conversely, if they didn't receive the miracle of hearing they would have understood what was being said and...

With respect 1stCL, if the miracle was in the hearing how could it be that the mockers thought it was gibberish?

Why is it that the foolish virgins didn't know that the wise virgins couldn't give them any oil. I think it was because the page they were on didn't allow it. Error cherished has a way of cancelling eye sight and hearing.

The Unclothed State Last time i checked it was when the bikini wasn't worn. So many words for the obvious!

My understanding is this:....My natural inclinations break God's Law (decalogue) thoughtlessly and as naturally as water off a ducks back. Lying and stealing, unfaithfulness and idolatry etc etc are the natural outworking of pleasing self. I live in opposition to his Law whether or not I'm aware...

I find it remarkable CI, that when you are asked a question to elaborate on your statements you bow out and put blame on the questioner as if the question is out of order.

what is it you didn't like about the quote?

It appears you are trying to negate the need for being righteous mark. When the scripture exhorts us to put away sin it is saying, be righteous. It does not tell us to resist the devil and from the other side of its mouth say, ha ha, all your efforts are worthless. Your opposition to having...

Here we go!... without reading/hearing/comprehension skills misinterpretation is sure to follow.....furthermore, unjustified accusations are the natural extension of those that feel threatened.

Good question. I think some of us crayons have lack lustre as a result of either all or some of those things. One thing is clear, those that have a heart for righteousness will behave righteously whether their pencils are sharp by human standards or no. I know for myself that I desire a better...

You have not answered, rather, you have been evasive. Your ignorance on the subject gets you to resort to what you have heard others say. You accuse Scott of not doing research yet your own is lacking dismally. In the light of this, is their any reason you should be taken seriously?

Yes, I have asked you that question before and as now you have not answered it. It says quiet clearly you are prepared to make judgements on material that you are ignorant about. We will let the readers decide where that leaves you!

What is the "Abomination of Desolation"? I have found this explanation very helpful.

CoreIssue, let me ask you this....is truth or lies determined by those who speak them? And besides, did you actually read it?