Search results

I never said they read it to verify scripture IF THEY TRUSTED PAUL BLINDLY. THEY WOULD NOT NEED TO LOOK AT SCRIPTURE. THEY WOULD JUST TAKE PAUL AT HIS WORD. and yes, I am yelling, I have never seen someone twist what is being said and sdo whatever she can to try to bring it to her favor.

Maam, You need to go to confession You lie about what others say more than almost anyone I know I never said I listen to men. You asked me who I would call if someone was sick. How do you get that to meaning I listen blindly to what they teach? it is sad you are so desperate to prove yourself...

I call the elders of my church or whatever church I go to. But I call people who can be trusted to correctly interpret the word also. 3 This is a faithful saying: If a man desires the position of a bishop, he desires a good work. 2 A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife...

Nope I care about what God will judge me on on judgment day. You should also.. I have yet to be in any Church, catholic, baptist, Lutheran, Non denominational. or any I visited in the military, where I agreed with everything they have said in that church. not because I did not trust my...

there is a difference SCRIPTURE WAS NOT COMPLETED YET!!!! Stop with your men comment, Your the one who listens to men.. lets truly keep it real here

Nope. You keep using the same excuses and claiming you know what I am saying, yet you keep failing miserably. You say keeping it real. Yet you DON:T keep it real I have said multiple times. When it comes to bible doctrine. to a teaching, to anything I have heard or read. I do as the Bereans...

I wonder how the mods let you continue in this place. This is yor representation of God? Its just the fact. As I spelled it out NO ONE CAN KNOW who is correct unless we have an INSPIRED GUIDE to for us to check. The bible tells us it can make us perfect. You tell me thats not true should I...

This is not true There is obedience out of faith and gratitude of being saved then their is obedience as a means of getting, maintaining or keeping salvation. True, If you do not obey the gospel. and become as the tax collector. You will not be saved But if your doing works of obedience to...

remember brother. Fatalists believe it is a work also never can fathom how me trusting in the work of someone else totally is a work of my own..

Its amazing, that Jesus mentions baptism in Mark 16. Yet in the very conversation with Nicodemus in John 3, where he tells him HOW to be born again, he totally forgets to mention the word. I guess Jesus forgot.

Your right, You don't You listen to what you are told to believe. And you take it as gospel truth. Much like the jews did in their day when a priest told them what to believe

I wish they would stop all the nonsense. We have a guy here who was turned down for a kidney transplant because he refuses to get a vaccine. Its nonsense. A vaccine protects the person vaxxed. Not other people.. I hope that goes through and others follow. The supreme court has stopped alot of it...

Your the one ignoring Jhn 3. I did not dodge crap. I just refuse to fall for your dodge of sticking to John 3 and Jesus words.

The word baptizo means to be immersed. It is the derivative of the word Bapto which means to dip. You will find no where in Ancient Greek literature where the word baptizo means sprinkled So You are the one ignoring the defenition of the word and listening to men.

I do not care what MEN say. I care what the word of God says. You want to blindly follow men and ignore the word of God and jesus own words. Thats on you

Lol. Ok whatever If they relied on the oral word. They never would have went to scripture to test it Unlike some, they do not blindly follow men.

Actually yest they did They did not blindly follow the apostle of Christ who was their leader they used scripture alone to prove what Paul said was true Paul said it is able to make us complete. and scripture was not even completed yet when he wrote that. Which means the scripture already in...

Well in John 3. Water and baptism are not equated. If it was. Jesus would have plainly told nicodemus that belief and baptism was required. and whoever did it would have eternal LIFE (born again) and that he who believes and is baptized is not condemned. but he who believes and is not baptized...

SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO Jesus tells nicodemus HOW to be born again, and leaves the word baptized out. and we are just supposed to ASSUME that baptism was required. Because Nicodemus MAY HAVE witnessed Jesus being baptized and would automatically assume that water means baptized? So what happens...

never seen an infant fully immersed in water, in the catholic or protestant church, every catholic or protestant infant ceremony, the priest sprinkles (rhantizo) the child with water. For evidence of this. look at Heb 9, where the priest sprinkled the book and the people. if this is true...