Search results

Why would you take a passage out of context? Jeremiah 31: 31 “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah— 32 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the...

I am not worried about some so called rapture. Let’s talk about the op. And How God redeeming Israel will bring the whole world to the knowledge of Christ. I showed you how the church can not fulfill those prophecies. We can even speak of this. What say you?

When you become a follower of men like many churches. You lose sight of what is real. Satan can decieve you without you even knowing

Look at Constantine, Who was ceasar of rime, and who instituted the church as the main religion of rome

We should just take it literally All things are lawful. But not all things are profitable. I can’t be judged eternally for what I do. All things are lawful But I can do things which will not profit me, in fact it may hurt me. May even kill me

And YOUR WRONG Um no it is not. Dispensationalism is a group of specific doctrines, It is not A doctrine I have spent 40 years in this teaching, I think I know what it is. You want to know what we teach Salk me Again, I do not follow Darby.

In other words you can’t find it. Its ok, You won’t. No place in the OT does it say the messiah Would die for the sin of the people. We are told a suffering servant would die for the sin of the people. Its part of the great mystery paul spoke of. it why the disciples were so confused when...

The ceasar was the pontifus Maximus. A title given to the height priest of the pagan cult Its funny how the pontifus Maximus of rome became the pope of the church. And all of a sudden all these pagan rituals and rites and temples are brought into the church and called christian.

Your out of line telling me what I believe. Dispensationalism is not a doctrine. It is an attempt to break history and the future down into categories. You still have not proven you even know what we believe.

Show me where messiah was said to die for the sins of the people I know daniel 9, The 59th has ended, the 70th is yet future.

Peter was called the rock. Christ was called the stone. That is the first thing we need to remember. Just because peter spoke does not mean he was in fact the ne man in charge Even paul had to rebuke peter public ally for sin. You do not rebuke your leader publically Jesus sent the disciples...

@robert derrick the last few posts you have made are false accusation against people. I will not stupe down to your level. You do not understand OSAS at all. And until you show a desire to understand what we believe, then there is no need to go further. Good luck my friend, I will pray for you.

Lol My friend, Your stuck on self righteousness. Osas teaches a man is justified by faith apart from works Then we begin a lifetime of being sanctified in the spirit. As God grows us into his image, this does not happen over night as some believe. I was saved from the penalty of sin. That is...

Ahh, so let me guess, You do not believe you sin? And if you do think you sin, do you hide it? Do you confess it? Do you acknowledge it? And if you do do that, why do you attack a person who believes in eternal security for doing the same thing you do? We Obey BECAUSE we love, We love because...

Ahh, I get it, You were told what we believe. You have never actually studied it. I love it when people come in and try to tell me what I believe and where my belief came from. Only to find out they only know what they were told by others. I used to be like you, Blindly led by people I look...

lol So instead of going to HIM. I should go to what someone else says about him. Thats your problem. Like all people who think they KNW what we believe, You believe what you are TOLD we believe, and nt what we actually believe. And then you attack us as being false teachers. When you do nto...

See once again, No dispensationalist I know in my 40 years of christianity believes this

Yeah and I edited it. I can see this is going nowhere

I see no false doctrine in anything you posted here. Where is it? Just because you know his history does nt mean you know what he teaches

You have not proved any heresy, only accuse. And yes it does have everything to do with Israel’s part.