Search results

There is no verse where Jesus claims to be God. There is no verse where Jesus claims to have created the universe. I'm sure you could quote verses and demand I interpret them the way you prefer. Not good enough! Not good enough by a long shot. Explicit teaching is Scripture is required...

One logical fallacy after another ... It's not the word. You are adding 'the word' to weaken the argument. Some claim the trinity is the central message of the Bible. It's so important that in 66 books, it is not mentioned once - not the word and not the doctrine. To this, trinitarians offer...

I get it from language usage. Trinitarians like to play the game that verses with ‘God, the Father’ imply other God’s. If this is so, every reference that ONLY has God must mean ‘God, in his unity nature’ or ‘God, in his unitarian nature.’ I add it for emphasis. One example is John 3:16. ‘God...

Oy vey. My fellow man is not the boss of me. Jesus will judge. Jesus IS the judge. That job is already taken. Why do so many seek to usurp the role of Jesus?

Correct. Do you recall Jesus saying do not resist evil? What does this mean? It means the EXACT OPPOSITE of what supporters of church bashers are defending. Do you grasp the difference between 'talking about' something and 'bashing' something? We are supposed to love and pray for our enemies...

Isn't religious liberty great? No one gets to decide what is 'false doctrine.'

One cannot answer a question with a question. This is just another example of you not answering questions, joking to avoid the uncomfortable subject of self-examination (why you believe what you believe).

That's just a great point! The trinitarian claim is John 1:1 reveals more about GE 1:1. Even more significantly, they attach some kind of duality to each Gospel, such as these Gospel's testify to Jesus humanity and this one testifies to Jesus's divinity. Huh? The Gospels testify to the life and...

If you are not ignoring, then why are you claiming I have not cited many Scripture verses, when, in fact, I cited many? Regarding your lack of understanding; did you even watch the video I provided? It went into depth explaining that words are WHAT's not WHO's and translations get it correct in...

Yes, it is improved understanding to redefine when the original definitions are shown to be wrong. For instance, in today's devotional reading from the NSRV Cultural Bible, it delved into word plays, which the ancient Hebrews were fond of doing but don't translate well from one language to...

I don't think that at all. It's that these individuals failed to live up to their own standards. They admitted as much. How you connect that to the conclusion they had wrong doctrine is sad.

What about mind your own business?

I reject the premise of your question. Scripture talks about offenses contrary to doctrine, not contrary doctrine. Scripture talks about judging action and choices - not beliefs - as the basis for marking. In addition, Scripture is talking about marking individuals, not whole churches. Finally...

What I gave many verses. Are you denying these verses because I did not include the book-chapter-# of verse?

The Bible is a unitarian text. ALL the words fit that. ‘For us, there is one God, the Father.’ 1 Cor 8:6

Not “he” but that, that word as in John 6:60. But I see you have just ignored the verses cited that destroy the trinity. You will not be convinced - even by Gods word.

OMG! Your error is to disregard the singular pronoun, ‘me.’ The trinity is a blatant violation of this loyalty to a unitarian, singular (not 3 in 1) God.

Which begs the question of why you enter threads like this? How do you reconcile that with John 4:23-24, where Jesus says true worshippers worship the Father?

Indeed, Jesus said his father is greater than him and that his father is the only true God.

John is the most anti-trinitarian book of the entire Bible. What John clearly say in 20:31 is that everything he wrote was to prove something else than what you are using his words to prove. This means that nothing John wrote can be used to prove what you say John clearly and unmistakably said.