Search results

The statement is that Jesus did not teach the trinity. Try finding an actual quote from Jesus where he teaches the trinity. I’m not buying into your imposing trinitarian doctrine onto unitarian text.

Isaiah was before Jesus’ ministry of teaching.

You are adding to the word of God to fit your heretical doctrine. Scripture does not say his humanity died. Scripture says Jesus died and God, in his unitarian nature, raised him from the dead. Acts 17:31. If Jesus were God, there would not be a single such verse that contrasts God with Jesus...

We know Jesus is not God because Jesus died. Jesus is certainly a created being, as all sons are. John 3:16 tell us Jesus was begotten, which means created! You should be sorry for violating the Sh’ma, 10th Commandment and how Jesus taught us to pray. Fact is, Jesus did not teach the trinity.

No. Just a figure of speech. When I dropped my wine glass, I was not actually declaring to be a piece of feces. No. He didn't. The modern day expression would be, "You sit on the throne of God forever." No. John never called Jesus God. The Gospel of John is the most anti-trinitarian book in...

You have the right to remain silent. Medical tyranny is no less tyranny because it is medical. I would say I am here for Reason X, not for the purpose of discussing other matters. They may reply with what they ‘need’ to do or what burden they have. Sorry, that’s not my problem.

Notice how Scripture does not read, "Jesus has made me free from sin?" This passage means that, through Christ, we are free from the consequences of our sin. The consequences of our sin is death and this is the law. We are free from the law but not free from sin any more than we are free from...

That's why I put Grailhunter on ignore a long time ago.

The right to privacy begins with not providing the information to be put into databases.

This is why, other than Trump, I have not voted for D or R in 24 years.

I look forward to Marymog's erudite response to this brilliant post.

I'm somewhat of an expert on Constitutional Law and the Roe v Wade decision, in particular, and want to make 3 points. 1. The State Has Compelling Interest Years ago I read an excellent book that is now out of print, Sweet Land of Liberty. The whole book was an analysis of only 8 Supreme Court...

I don't know how to change a title once posted.

The other thread pits the Vaccine pros against nothing. It does not matter how many millions have to die to advance the agenda. The media will not be reporting on Vaccine death and destruction.

What does the Bible say? When the mark of the beast is required to buy and sell many saints will fall away.

Wow! I never heard that. Can I find out more from J.R. Church "Hidden Prophecies In The Psalms"?

Agreed. Can I avoid all the beast requires? We'll see. “...to the last I grapple with thee; from hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee.” ― Herman Melville, Moby-Dick or, the Whale

Nonsense! The Court are not our friends. The Devil was temporarily stymied in his goals and what? I should feel silly for calling out the danger.

The Watermelons are silent on this! Watermelon = Green on outside, Red to the core on the inside.

Despite the rhetoric, violence solves problems. Always has. Always will. Just ask any momma bear. It is why every government in the history of mankind has maintained an armed police and military force. In the end, almighty God will annihilate undesirables in a Lake of Fire. Thomas Jefferson...