Search results

Well unbiased is your definition. I want to know the standard accepted universal definition, not just what you call credible. and I want to know when you cite a source you know the authors are not biased in any way shgape or form. Yo opened this can of worms so now I want answers. Stop being...

I agree sin is sin. but until you can show that getting vaccinated is a sin, where is the sin? Is the polio vaccine sin? Shingles? Pneumonia? flu? TDAP? MMR? Tetanus? Even the Mosaic Law had a provision for those who did something unknowingly. but what makes teh covid vaccine sin? Is it all...

I gave them, maybe you had your nose so stuck up in the air you missed the posts I showed. Oh well your loss. Spanks from you are badges of merit.

And lying again doesn't make it so! I am anti-Catholicism not anti catholic. Do try to get that through your superior intellect skull please. Even an uneducated moron rube like me knows the difference.

Well then cite the passage where it clearly shows that God changed the Sabbath seeing as you said yes. that must mean you have seen such a passage. so share it.

Well apak: It is you who are pulling straws. "Pros" is a directional word and all the definitions given show a direction or "place". With is the correct definition in this case versus the other directional or place words it is translated. Context determinies. As for theos in the second...

Well I didn't follow your answer in other threads. I have asked you here. I am sure if you have answered it many times you can write a succinct answer here. Or cut and paste an answere from the dozens of other times you answered it where I wasn't on that thread.

Well as the church will not be here when the mark of the beast is instituted, we need not worry about whether or not we can take the mark! But I asgree with you, I see no valid reason to knowingly inject myself with an rfid chip. they already can follow us via our smart phones.

Yeah they will! they are the ones that will enter the millenial kingdom on earth as is said by Jesus in Matt. 24. they are the ones that endured to teh end without taking th emark and helping the 144,000 or th ejews.

Still wrong. Nowhere do we find i nHis Word that He changed why the sabbath is celebrated or that He changed teh day. Teh church celebrates on sunday as tradition of the resurrection (the first day of the week) But not by command.

Why are you afraid of answerring my question? You have rigidly avoisding answering whatr is said in Gods Word: John 2:18-23 King James Version 18 Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign shewest thou unto us, seeing that thou doest these things? 19 Jesus answered and said unto...

YOu can disagree, but you can never be absolutely sure according to your own remarks. YOu have the right to do whatever you wish. Yo will n ot stand before me- You will stand before the Lord God Jesus Christ and give an account for rejecting teh SCriptrures for a reinterpreted version promoted...

If only you did express what is the truth of Scripture. What you do is express the vomited reinterpretation that the Watchtower has commanded y0ou to express and brainwashed you to believe by their slick methods of human philosophy. The Watchtower itself wrote for the world to see that if one...

But they omit and reject the most important part- that He physically rose from the dead which keeps all who buy the Watchtower lie from ever obtaining salvation. what you wrote about the death and reason for Jesus is 99% true! but it is the 1% of ricin that kills the followers of the...

Different word with different meaning. Mark is charagma which AFAIK always is a literal physical mark. Seal is sphragazo which is mostly used of a non literal mark. IN the future it could very well mean a literal mark in the tribulation. REv. 7&9 could be either literal or the normal non...

Well I was quoting your expert credible historical scholars. and I linked to you all the drawings showing dagon as half man half fish. and His name means nothing as to what he was depicted. Nowhere in SCripture is he called the god of grain. HIs name may be derived for grain, but that does...

As to John 1b and the word with(pros) you are incorrect: The KJV translates Strong's G4314 in the following manner: unto (340x), to (203x), with (43x), for (25x), against (24x), among (20x), at (11x), not translated (6x), miscellaneous (53x), variations of 'to' (1x). it is a directional word...

You can come up with all the reasons you wish! but there is only on ereason that matters. GODS WORD calls it a physical mark and that is what matters. All the philosphizing in the world does not change that simple fact. There were enormous ways God could have inspired John to write if e did...

So explain JOhn 1:1. You keep dodging to answer this simple request. then John 5:18 then 1 Tim. 3:16 Phillipians 2 all these passages from GODS WORD says Jesus is THEOS or God. YOu say He is not- so please explain why theos does not mean God in these passages.

It says that in Peter in reference to Gods patience which tells us it is to be understood metaphorically, but nowhere do we find comparative terms in regards to the thousand years. And as god communi9cates in terms we are designed to understand why would he deviate from time telling for this...