Search results

I tell one thing...keep your eyes open for the old ones....The misprints are worth money, so are the fancy illustrated table top bibles.

I did, no J's in the scriptures...no J's before 1400 AD

Read it still wrong And by the way it Yeremiah 8:8

No chance of J's in the scriptures

The word Jesus did not exist before 1400 AD even the KJV did not use it until the "J" slam.

Yahweh is the name of God the Father. Yahweh was in the Old Testament 6800 times. Then they removed it and replaced it with the tetragrammaton YHWH. Then they removed that and replaced it with God or Lord. Now you have a Bible that has had the names of God the Father and God the Son completely...

That is too much work to be absolutely wrong. Sorry. It is absolutely impossible for a "J" to be in any scripture. Impossible! The Letter "J" and its pronunciation did not exist until 1400 years after Christ and did not become popular until the 1600's...1600 years after Christ. The first KJV...

Not impossible but the line of thinking was that the Tetragrammaton was to help the Priest remember the correct pronunciation, The "V" could have thrown them off. Still not impossible

He does have a name. It has been known for thousands of years and is still known today. Yeshua has only been called Jesus from the 1600s AD. Iēsous...In the Latin Bibles from around 400 AD. Iēsous...Greek in the original New Testament texts and the first bound Bibles. But Christ's name was...

It is one of the reasons that Latin does not matter. Even in the 1600's the Bible was being translated into different languages but when it came to persons, places, and things, the words can be pronounced in similar fashion. Most of this is about if you think there is significance and power in...

Well God the Father's name is Yahweh, God the Son's name is Yeshua, instead of having a Bible with God's name in it, now we do not. We could call them George and Tom...if their names do not matter. Up to the 1600's Jesus was an non-word. Paul said only one name could be called upon for...

lol In the Bible, Person, places, and things were targeted by the "J" slam. Now most of this can be easily verified by looking in the Strong's Exhaustive Concordance...Look at the pronunciations of the words. This affects both the Old and New Testament. And yes if you go visit Jerusalem you will...

First off I am not a Jew. Circle Globe

lol

When we look at the New Testament, the closest thing to infant baptism that we find is the reference to three “households” being baptized. In 1 Corinthians 1:16, This here is something you have to make clear. There are going to be some people that will not be able to fathom the concept that...

@Renniks @Philip James I hope you guys are not debating or taking exception to this being a Catholic belief. Infant baptism did not originate with the Catholics. From the earliest writings that we have, this is a practice of the early church. From there the beliefs of Fundamentalists are...

Define "originally" lol

I with you on the removing the name of God from the Bibles. But there is a history about this. Most of this had to do with the "J" slam. The letter "J" nor its sound, did not appear until 1400 years after Christ. It does not become popular until the 1600's. The first KJV's did not have the word...

Is CNN an news agency? Did not know that they qualified.

When you open the Bible and you read it....it reads you. I have said it many times. You will find your character in the scriptures...You raise your flag and wave it! I don't have to do nothing but believe! As if you knew what belief meant! I don't have to do what Christ said, I just gotta...