Search results

What an odd question and totally irrelevant for the point does not hinge on who we are but death. The Bible says over and over again that Jesus died. Your doctrine does not accept this because of your doctrine. 2 Cor 1:13 explicitly states there is no hidden meaning in the Apostles writings...

Totally wrong and completely illogical. Where is this in the Bible? And I'm not JW. This is right and logical. The only reason you and I are out of our sins is because Jesus is not God for he is our only mediator to God. (Unless you mean something else by 'still in your sins') Of course, to...

Irrelevant for this thread is about our actions - and motives - not God's.

Understood. John 3:16 has nothing to do with this thread. Just another attempt on your part to change the subject, the burden you have to slay your idolized doctrine. There is no equality between doctrinal purity and love. Not only is that explicit in 1 Corinthians 13:12-13, you know there is...

Mainly because we disagree on every single point. Indeed, we are communicating effectively. Every SINGLE time you disregard loving those whose doctrine is not the same as yours but defend the wonders of truth, we disagree. Scripture is annoyingly unqualified in our burden to love others. This...

Unable to have an actual conversation. Don't risk independent thought, just defer. In logic, Appeal to Diversion.

God did no such thing. Acts 17:31 informs us that God chose the man Jesus. This is not at all the same as God became incarnate. The worse part of the trinity doctrine is that it undermines Jesus achievement and sacrifice. Jesus died. Not in form or other appearance of non-death. It is really a...

Agreed but it seems to contradict to the rest of your post. This makes no sense. For 1,000's of years sacrifices were atonement for people's sins. If you want to add truly to the sentence, it changes nothing. It's just that a new covenant was put in place, not a more truer covenant. This new...

Clearly, you are putting nouns (truth) above verbs (love). Your doctrine contradicts Scripture. I know it is hard for you to destroy your idol, your idolized doctrine. 12 For now, we can only see a dim and blurry picture of things, as when we stare into polished metal. I realize that...

Only his body part? Either he died or he didn’t.

There is no but. Truth is a noun. Love is a verb. If your ‘truth’ denigrates image beaters of God, you have sinned against God and man.

Agreed. However, you are judging others in violation of Ja 4:11-12. The Spirit of God is discerning and Ecclesiastes informs us there are different season to do opposite things. A time to save and a time to kill. One with little understanding will not grasp how doing these opposite things IS in...

You are lost, holding your doctrine to such a idol, you completely miss it being of secondary importance. Not once did I ever say what you wrote above. The challenge is dealing with other who do NOT live by your little & irrelevant doctrines - irrelevant to those who do not share them.

You are missing the point for that is not my argument at all. Not once did I mention emotion. Refer to Rom 14:1,13; Jam 4:11-12; & John 13:35 for clarification on what my argument is.

Then it is an act of injustice, to accept a unflawed life for a flawed life. Honestly, the necessity or practicality of the sacrifice being unflawed, is asserted but goes against Scripture. Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins. Ecclesiastes 7:20

What is nonsense is the impossibility of God dying. If Jesus were God, who raised him from the dead? The 'life for life' standard necessary means the sacrifice must be made by one who can die. This being cannot be God because Scripture tells us God does not change. Death is the ultimate change.

Sadly, I disagree. The burden of proof is on the one making the positive claim. Denying the claim has no burden. (Don't use semantics to pretend denying the claim is making a claim for such a twist is a negative claim, negating the positive claim). I hold the one valid reason to reject Christ...

Amazing how frequently this transparent tactic is embraced by the lost, the walking dead.

You are lost. Enemies of God deliberately set a standard of proof designed to fail the chosen people. Obviously, you have little trust in your fellow man. In Evidence To Be Seen, I delve into standards of proof. In short, let's use the legal civil standard of more likely than not. And let's...