Search results

Scripture proves it - repeatedly.

Lie on top of lie. This is one of the most known errors in KJV. 7 So there are three testifying witnesses: 8 the Spirit, the water, and the blood. All three are in total agreement. 1 John 5:7-8 The Voice

Funny, I was just reading in 2 Chronicles that 400 false prophets were proven wrong by 1 true prophet. Democracy is not how truth is determined.

Well, there are other speculators who cause confusion ...

The extent people go to rationalize their doctrine! It is much more reasonable to suppose ONE verse, Matthew 28:19, was expanded to comply with doctrine than many verses were "abbreviated" to cause confusion.

What say you about all the verses, like Acts 2:38; Acts 8:12; Acts 8:16; Acts 10:48; Acts 19:5; Acts 22:16; Romans 6:3; 1 Corinthians 1:13; Galatians 3:27 that say to baptize ONLY in Jesus' name? Kind of makes the one lone verse of Matthew 28:19 suspicious in the extreme.

And the unitarians/monotheists had to constantly deal with the Trinitarian heretics. o_O Just a reminder, the trinity is not in the Bible - not the word, not the doctrine. Odd for how important you claim it to be.

How do you know this? I think the Catholic church is anti-Christ, usurping his authority on Earth and therefore, have some evil in them. Pure evil? That is Islam, IMO.

God raised the dead corpse of Jesus into a glorified body, where God then gave Jesus all authority in heaven and Earth. So, there is that.

If you do not think Jesus was immaculately conceived, I take it you deny Mary was immaculately conceived. Am I right? Putting aside how Mary came to carry the Son of God, this is called the Incarnation. Many who are not Catholics do not realize that the "Immaculate Conception" pertains to...

Your ‘standard’ of proof is not mine. You cannot rationalize the Apostles repeatedly disobeying the Risen Lord.

Why The Apostles Repeatedly Disobeyed the Risen Lord | Christian Forums @ Christianity Board

While that is your dogma, that is not the actual text. Mary is the mother of Lord Jesus, not God. It's a sin to go beyond the word of God.

I saw this one. Very good!

Not sure what you even mean about bottling it up. As far as answering the other points you made; I guess I'm still focused on the 1st boo-boo that you are failing to admit. There are many lords in the Bible and note of them are God.

Let's see Biblical Popery. LOL

And no way of coming up with the notion of Immaculate Conception of Mary.

Proving my point. Lowercase ‘Lord’ is NOT a synonym for God. Only the capitalized variant is. So, a Catholic starts off this thread under false pretenses, pretending your doctrine is in the Bible when it is not. Had the statement been, Mary is the mother of our Lord, I would have agreed all...

Not at all. It goes right to the heart of the matter. Your retreating to foreign languages is a Confession you’ve lost the argument and hope to divert attention elsewhere.

And the double whammy is this heretical statement is made under the auspices of 'Biblical Mary.' If I wanted to talk about my doctrine, like I have in various threads, the thread title states my doctrine, then I look for Bible verses to support my doctrine. To pretend the thread is only on what...