Search results

Never heard of Messianic Jews, huh?

Clearly, you don't want to stick with the OP for the Book of Acts destroys trinitarianism in no uncertain terms. John 1:1 is referred to so desperately precisely because it is vague enough to give hope to the hopeless doctrine of the trinity, which does not even have Jesus in the text. To...

Thomas did not make the statement Jesus was God. It was merely an exclamation. When I drop my wine glass and exclaim, “oh crap!” I am not literally claiming the wine glass is feces.

No, you did not do this. Many here refer to a verse claiming it “supports” their doctrine. Such efforts are a far cry from an explicit teaching in Scripture, such as For us, there is one God, the Father. Reading trinitarian doctrine into unitarian text does NOT overcome explicit teachings in...

It's not about me. It's about invalid ideas, e.g., the trinity and applying infinity to actual existents, square circles.

As do all denominational Apostles.

You DON'T KNOW that. Jesus did not condemn him. That's good enough for me. Obviously, you know better than the Son of God.

Again, the EXACT OPPOSITE is the case. Trinitarians impose their 4th century doctrine onto unitarian text. A way to know you are wrong is that Jews are monotheist and reject the trinity to this day.

Not sure how you are parsing God with divinity in us. Jesus is not called God in the Bible because he is not his Father. Said differently, the Bible says through the Serpent that man can be like God in eating the forbidden fruit. Calling the fruit the pathway to divinity does not make it so.

Almost got it right. The church is not founded on Peter. The church is founded on Peter's Confession, that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, the Savior of the World, the long awaited Messiah, God's Anointed.

LOL Not sure what your criteria is for starting a church OTHER THAN acting as God commands - even if not a part of the traditional church.

You have it backwards. No one is obligated to post in threads they don’t relate to. (I am not starting these threads to relate to trinitarians but to support non-trinitarian Christians).

The reason your suggested approach makes no sense whatsoever is that it concedes the field of the monotheist nature of God, which many Christians hold, which does not violate the 1C.

You have repeatedly reached for an arbitrary division of 3 to support you doctrine that is not in Scripture. And it is so easy to refute. The federation, the Federal government was formed by 13 States.

Your logic is predictably backwards. IF it was important, the trinity and the doctrine of the trinity would explicitly be in the Bible.

I’ve demonstrated REPEATEDLY how Acts logically states Jesus is not God. You have not quoted one verse supporting your claim.

Reiterating the assertion does not make it so. Jesus is no kind of God. Being the Son, means one is not the Father. The Father alone is God alone. ‘For us, there is one God, the Father’ 1 Corinthians 8:6

Having the Spirit of God in us, are we too not divine, which is why we are called children of God? Jesus is not divine but, like us, has divinity within him.

I do not disagree with the Apostle John at all. I disagree with your take on what he wrote. The whole world is in the hands of the evil one but God's chosen are not part of this world. I really have no idea what your problem is with this but make a blessed day.

I don't agree. You are trying to make a subtle point not found in Scripture. This world has fallen, which means under the control of the Adversary. While we, chosen by God, live in this world, we are not of this world.