Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    There are numerous reasons why someone may disagree with the SCriptures that prove that right. I would not confine them to just your rather acerbic reasons. Those are some. but there are other reasons as well. I couldn't answer a hypotheticasl for we don't know the person or their reasoning...
  2. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    Well you are listening to teh liberal scholars who push the NT firther badck in history than is possible. Paul was executed by rome in teh mid -50's A.D. so his epistles were all written by then. Luke was his companion so HIs gospel and Acts were also written by then. The last books of the...
  3. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    That is silly! Jesus is the Creator of the entire universe! If He revealed Himself to us, IF, IF, IFA there is life out there other than the cherubs, Seraphs, and angels, I do not think that god would withhold the knowledge of Himself from them.
  4. Ronald Nolette

    The False Doctrine with key word "COVER"

    Before I proceed, I need to ask you- are you espousing a person live a sinlessly perfect life on earth once they are born again ?
  5. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    We don't! Simply because the bible in light of all other passages unambiguously declares water Baptism doesn't save! So B is right biblically. Simply accepting what a church teaches without investigating is foolishness! Most of the arguments that we see are because people accept a churches...
  6. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    the first 5 points I agree with wholeheartedly! point 6. Jesus is the word made flesh- not an unleavened wafer. Point 7.We have no altar for we have no sacrifice. Jesus sacrifice was once for all time! There is no "perpetual sacrifice of the mass". We have no need to "replay ' His...
  7. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    Given teh nature of teh Passover meal and that the early church for over 7 years was over 99.9% Jewish that is one fact. Paul never taught the doctrine of Roman transubstantiation. There was no priesthood holding ritualistic "masses" till much later. For the longest time only Baptism and the...
  8. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    This is a misnaming of what non-Catholics actually teach and believe. There is only one interpretation of SCripture- what is written in light of all other passages relating to what is written in that topic. There are many applications to the one interpretation at times and that is what the...
  9. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    Actually teh 3rd cup is the cup of redemption and that is the one Jesus passed to the disciples signifying what that cup meant in its typology. The fourth cup is the cup of blessing or praise. Absolutely! they would have seen the fulfilment of the types and remember the Lord and not the...
  10. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    Well as both of you look at the 1,000 years as symbolic, (though I can show why there is no reason to) you both still have the same problem. There is a resurrection, then after that symbolic time Satan is loosed and there is another resurrection that Scripture says the lake of fire has...
  11. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    I believe covenantalists and dispensationalists are brethren. Speaking in general terms( for there are always exceptions) 1. We both believe in the virgin birth. 2. We both believe in the absolute deity of Jesus Christ. 3. We both believe in the death and physical resurrection of Jesus for sin...
  12. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    Well Sweetie: If you bothered to read teh scriptures I posted you would see how God intends to establish a 1,000 year earthly kingdom that Jeus reigns over before He gives it back to HIs Father and subjects Himself to God again. If you bothered with an yof the videos I posted there go into teh...
  13. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    I fully agree there is a present kingdom! But it is not the physical kingdom that is to happen when Jesus physically returns and resotres most of teh earth for 1,000 years! May be you should read the versed I provided. But Here are a few more about teh aspects of the kingdom: Ez. 44:1-46:24...
  14. Ronald Nolette

    Would the US government allow anyone to interpret the US constitution?

    I stand corrected. the falsehood of the Lords Supper being the actual body and blood of Jesus, started about 70 years earlier than I studied and found. See I know if we drink it unworthily we sin against teh Lord, but having been taught the Seder and seeing the symbolism of all the parts of...
  15. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    WOW So the one who expected to tuck my tail and bolt is bolting! But as my parting gift to you. you completely and utterly failed to show: 1. Amillenialism is biblical 2. The Church has to go through THE TRIBULATION as SCroipture says we don't. 3. YOu failed to acknowledge there is even an...
  16. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    Well I can't for the bride is a class from time, not who is worthy or not worthy. The Bride started at Pentecost and ends when the Groom comes and snatches His bride. Try reading this short manuscript and see how so much of the return of Jesus, the rapture, the lime lag we live in now etec...
  17. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    Show me where saints in the tribulation are filled with the Spirit! They are marked with an external seal to identify them as Gods, but they are people who can lose their salvation if they falter and take the mark! They are of course welcomed at the marriage supper! Just as the OT saints are...
  18. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    Yes we are saints. I never said different. Just like Israel is called saints and the tribulation believers are called saints. Why are you rehashing this? Yes the church is one body in Christ. But ISrael and Adam are not teh church and based on Rev. 20 the tribulations saints are not part of...
  19. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    No and I gave you the verses and even cited a manuscript that shows why the rapture has to be before the tribulation starts.
  20. Ronald Nolette

    John Darby

    I am not going to go through all the posts, but based on which books, I know they were not to show a difference between church and tribulation saints.