Search results

I think the tithe doctrine is the greatest stumbling block that the churches have put in the path of sinners. People that are poor that attempt to be saved may decline and do decline. When I met with the pastor to be baptized in 1979. He told me I had to agree to tithing. I was making minimum...

The disciples that baptized by immersion in the name of Jesus in the book of Acts were water heretics. Great, just great.

No, you got that all wrong, a protestant is defined as someone who protests Peter per Acts 2:38. Your RCC church is the mother of all protestants. You are the very first organization to protest Acts 2:38 and end it. The rest of your protestant daughters follow you like lemmings. Get that right.

You cannot baptize in the name of Jesus without saying the name of Jesus. You can’t do any works or deeds in the name of Jesus, without saying the name of Jesus.

Blah blah blah blah blah. The fact is, Jesus inherited his name from his Father. You have no idea how inheritance is obtained and if it belong to somebody prior. You guys are so messed up it is pathetic. I saw the mass Greek come out and the mass commentary trying to debunk Hebrews chapter 1...

He showed Truther commentary from the Internet. He has no idea where all that garbage came from. He’ll believe anything they tell him.

My men? Who are my men? I am not a protestant, but you are a protestant. Your men protested Peter and disobeyed Acts 2:38, causing an avalanche of Acts skippers. I agree with Peter wholeheartedly. All of you folks are protestants, including Catholics.

I am wrong for commanding someone to baptize in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins just like Peter did?

OK, I won’t comment at all. Read it and weep… ….as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name…. Lol

Here comes all the extra biblical commentary and a massive blast of Greek redefinitions… Lol

Read it and weep….as he hath by inheritance… obtained a more excellent name… Bingo Why is it a more excellent name? Because he inherited it. Super simple.

Listen here, Catholic, you inherit something that first belongs to somebody else. Let that sink in.

Are you and your modern commentaries trying to disinherit Jesus of his name?

No, it doesn’t. Hebrews says he by inheritance received his name. It doesn’t say what you said. That’s just weird. Now, who did he inherit his name from? I guarantee you will never answer that question.

Hebrews 1:4 says that Jesus received his name by inheritance. Did he inherit it from somebody other than his Father? 4 Being made so much better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they. Please explain

So you are saying that we can inherit our fathers name, but Jesus cannot inherit his Father‘s name? Are we better than he? Also, the name of the son is not Jesus? Also, the Holy Ghost was not sent in Jesus name after all? What other name was it sent in? Also, Jesus is not holy and is not a...

We are to feed the sheep, not shepherd them. We’re just helpers in his herd. None of us can lead people spiritually because we are only quasi spiritual. Our job as Christian leaders is to point people to the shepherd and continue pointing them to the shepherd. Not to stand in the way between...

Yep. And the first thing they rob folks of is the tithe

Hahaha

That works. One thing is for sure, there are definitely no sub shepherds in God‘s kingdom. There’s only one shepherd and the sheep here only his voice. Anybody else that tries to claim to be some type of shepherd over God’s sheep is a robber.