Search results

Here is what Paul said about men who we call church fathers that would be preceding him. 29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. 30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples...

I am OK with history, Josephus, etc., etc. It must be taken with a grain of salt. It is not perfect. Not even close. It’s a bunch of people with the opinions written whenever and nobody knows exactly when. It cannot be used in arguments to bolster the scripture. The scripture stands alone and...

We do have the actual writings? Who is we? The Roman Catholic Church, correct?

I can clobber anybody scripturally with Bible only. I can’t compete with commentary, though, there’s too much of it. People poke each other in the eye with commentary all day long and never understand the truth.

No wonder Christianity is completely turned on its head. There’s 1000 different truths in Christianity today. And they all beg to differ.

Oh, this church, father said this, and this church father said that, and James Strong said this, and and and…. This is what you guys look like. You guys slice and dice the Bible with fake fathers and fake Greek redefinitions. What a mess.

I confirm the Bible. You confirm the Bible. Do you need some fake news to confirm the Bible? Donald Trump confirms the Bible. Come on man.

Is this writing an original from 1800 years ago, or was it perfectly preserved on ancient paper by scholars? Tell me more about it history OK?

The Bible. Next question.

What is the name of the son per Matthew 28:19? If you can give me the right answer, I will give you a like.

Don’t you guys see how messed up you all are? Don’t you guys see why Martin Luther said sola scriptura? This commentary stuff is madness and it is taken over Christianity. Nobody reads their Bible only anymore. They are consumed with mass commentary. It is clear to see even on this thread.

These first through fourth century “early Church fathers“ writings are fake tricks that the Roman Catholic Church has invented to create a trail of succession to try to act like they were promoted by the apostles. Nobody has seen these documents. Folks in modern times quote them from the...

No hate for the RCC folks at all. I used to be RCC. I am now a first century apostolic. All I do is make sure people understand that the RCC is fake news and the great whore of the book of Revelations . Hopefully that does not offend them.

I know that when I come to somebody in the name of somebody, I speak the name of that somebody. I don’t try to act like it can be anybody like you guys do.

Have you ever seen an actual document from those ancient church fathers? Or do you take somebody else’s word that they exist? Just think for a minute, the original scriptural manuscripts have disintegrated and all we have is copies and copies of copies. So, with that in mind, you think that the...

They have a product called waterless car wash. I guess you spray it on wipe it off and you don’t need to rinse it. Those that disobey Acts 2:38 are the modernist waterless car wash salvation salesmen … Lol.

In your opinion, just like the opinion of the Roman Catholic Church, you think in the name of the son is son. It is clear to me that not a single one of you guys know what the name of the son is per Matthew 28:19. Instead, you deflect and say, in the authority of, in the authority of, in the...

More Internet, fake news from fake ancient fathers. None of these people were early church fathers. They were the wolves that Paul spoke about that would come after he was gone in Acts chapter 20. They were all reprobates that were heading in the direction of becoming the Roman Catholic Church...

It must be because of the waterless car washes nowadays.

Beware of Internet, historians