Search results

The Catholics teach that the name of the son is son. They don’t say I baptize you in the name of the father and in the name of Jesus and in the name of of the Holy Ghost. They skip the name of Jesus entirely. Plus, babies cannot repent. Plus, babies cannot receive the gift of the Holy Ghost per...

Lesson 7- Page 7 This is how the Catholic Church was founded.

I used to be a Catholic. I know all about the Catholic Church. I know all about the history of the Catholic Church. They are the queen of all Acts skippers. They are the church that started, mixed with paganism, Judaism and Christianity and their number one main objective was to cause people to...

They did not exist as an entity back then in the first century. They developed into what is known as the Catholic Church in Rome in the fourth century.

The Roman Catholic church is unfounded in scripture, just like hundreds and perhaps thousands of their doctrines that are unfounded. They don’t even resemble the first century church in the book of Acts. They are a later religion that are comprised of paganism, Judaism and Christianity. They...

The church of Rome in the first century that Paul addressed was not the Roman Catholic Church. The RCCs that were the pagans that later centuries adopted some Christian ideas. The Romans that Paul addressed the obeyed the book of Acts(2:38), which the Roman Catholic Church opposed vehemently...

The Roman Catholic Church and the Catholic Church are the exact same entity. They are synonymous.

Not at all, you guys teach that he that is baptized shall eventually believe and be saved. It’s backward theology. I guess when you baptize unrepentant and untaught newborn children, that’s what you end up with.

Your post is a false witness of the 500 true witnesses. There was no such thing as the Roman Catholic Church in the first century.

Wrong, over 500 people witnessed the resurrected Jesus and told the world of it. Then the NT was written about it, pre Catholicism.

The Roman Catholics teach you, he that is baptized then eventually believeth shall be saved. They are as bad as their protestant daughters that teach he that believeth and is saved shall be baptized… Lol

The biblical order is to teach them then to baptize them. Not baptize them, then teach them. Boy what a mess.

Another weird thing that the Roman Catholics practice, the Bible says to go and teach all nations baptizing them… I have never heard of a Catholic teaching an infant and baptizing them. What’s wrong with this picture?

Infants are unable to obey Acts 2:38.

Obeying Acts 2:38 is the universal starting point for all Christians. Everybody else need not apply.

I am only obeying Acts 2:38 in its most simplistic terms. It is you fellas that are trying to talk your way out of it.

He that believeth not shall be damned… because obviously he will not be baptized.

Bunch of “Christians“ running around telling everybody what they believe the Bible says …..without themselves having the remission of sins. This is like the twilight zone.

No, read this carefully Then Peter said unto them repent, and be baptized, every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins…. Not because of, not formerly having, but for the…

I am putting 1/2 of one verse for you to read because you cannot even get past it. You can’t even get baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins so why should we talk about more? You have to have remission of sins before you can apply Romans through Revelations to your...