Search results

Satan's binding is described in a figurative way in Revelation 20. To take what is clearly symbolism so literally reveals the carnal and earthly perspective that you have. As Christians, we should have a spiritual and heavenly perspective. It is only because Satan is bound that we have the...

Yep. Premils always ignore Acts 1:8 when they reference Acts 1:6.

Stop misrepresenting Amil. It makes you look like a fool. Amils do not claim that the thousand years don't (or won't) exist. We just have a different understanding of when it begins and when it ends then Premils do. It clearly has a beginning and an ending. It clearly indicates that Satan is...

Amen. Amils are looking forward to what Peter said we should be looking forward to in fulfillment of the promise of Christ's second coming and Premils are not. That is the bottom line. 2 Peter 3:3 Above all, you must understand that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and following...

Grow up, Ronald. We're not interested in playing your games. Asking us to forfeit something that we don't even believe in is complete nonsense. Is this all you have to offer is nonsense like this? Trying actually backing up your beliefs with scripture for once instead of messing around and...

Not sealed in the way you think. You are the one who thinks that him being bound has to do with him being completely incapacitated, not me. I believe his binding relates to passages like these: Hebrews 2:14 Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his...

Is that what I said? No, not even close. So, you are showing once again that you are completely lacking in reading comprehension skills. It is a complete waste of time trying to have a discussion with you because you don't understand anything that is said to you.

Grow up. That is not what is happening here. We all know there is at least some symbolism in the book of Revelation. Why do you act as if symbolism is a bad thing? Such nonsense. You're all talk. You back it up with nothing. It says that in the most highly symbolic book in all of scripture...

You need to repent of your arrogance. Why are you acting as if you know me when you clearly do not? My beliefs aren't based on men's traditions whatsoever. And I believe the Holy Spirit has shown me things every bit as much as you think He has shown you things. And, yet, we disagree on some...

I don't need to promise that I won't have anything to do with something that isn't even going to happen.

John MacArthur is a false teacher, so I'm not going to be convinced of anything taught by him. If the 144,000 are firstfruits of Israel, then why wouldn't it be referring to the ones James wrote about here: James 1:1 James, a servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ, To the twelve tribes...

Give them another chance? Where are you coming up with this? He has given them plenty of chances for the past 2,000 years. Do you think the God who wants all people to repent and be saved has purposely withheld salvation from the Jews for the past 2,000 years? No, He has not! Read Daniel 9:24...

That doesn't matter. It is not Amillennialism itself that promotes anti-Semitism. None of us Amils here promote anti-Semitism, for example. So, I don't appreciate someone acting as if it does. I am not Catholic and I think they have a lot of false doctrine and extra-biblical teaching...

That isn't what I was saying and you know it. The prophecy is speaking generally and not saying that literally all Jews would be saved and know the Lord. Do you think the following is referring to God pouring out His Spirit on literally all people? Acts 2:15 These people are not drunk, as you...

That is symbolic text. Unless you think the earth will literally flee away somehow? Scripture says it will be burned up and made new. Scripture promises that the meek shall inherit the earth and that wouldn't be much of a promise if they only inherit it for a temporary period of time.

That will happen AFTER the current "heavens are no longer". Did you not even read his post and the scripture he posted? So, the only way for "his Redeemer and God" to stand on this earth is to stand on this earth after it has been renewed (the new earth) since it will occur after the current...

So, they will eat the flesh of those who were slain with a literal sword coming out of Christ's mouth, right?

His post was excellent. It's not surprising that you would choose not to address anything he said since he absolutely destroyed your doctrine using scripture.

You have mortal flesh and blood inheriting the kingdom of God which is a blatant contradiction of 1 Corinthians 15:50 which says that mortal flesh and blood will NOT inherit the kingdom of God. Your unwillingness to address this and alter your understanding accordingly says it all about you...

Do you know how many posts are in this thread? I'm not going to go back and look for it. I tried to search for it and don't see anything. Do you know which post number it was?