Search results

I cannot imaging myself leaving this life into eternity without being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of my sins. I would baptize myself in the name of Jesus in private if I was facing this situation. I especially would not be telling others to NOT be baptized in the...

Is that one case of NEVER using the name of Jesus, this?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, ... Do you care about everything else but the remission of sins? Does water alone scare you or Jesus name...

You and your Roman Catholic cronies have all conspired to do away with the name of Jesus Christ in water baptism for the remission of sins. Their master plan began in the fourth century A.D. and continues until today. Nearly All of the Protestants are implicated in the same crime. All of you...

You think to baptize in the name of Jesus Christ is to not say the name of Jesus Christ. That is the equivalent to doing miracles in the name of Jesus Christ by not saying the name of Jesus Christ. This is bizarre ideology in Christendom. You are a purveyor of it.

With all of that commentary, you just did away with the name of Jesus. Congratulations Catholic.

You think that saying the name of Jesus is the equivalent to a magic codeword? That is what caused the lame man per Acts chapter 3 to be healed according to Peter when he was question by the authorities. He said it is by the name of Jesus and faith in his name does this man stand before you...

We put in motion the remission of sins when we baptize someone in the name of Jesus Christ as the apostles dead in the book of Acts. It is all about the name of Jesus and not about our particular mode of faith.

So, Jesus said this?... ....authority to declare Christ's own forgiveness of sins available to those who repent in his name. His atonement took place *at the cross.* Or this?... Whose soever sins you remit, they are remitted to them; and whose soever sins you retain,... ....Men and...

So, the improper way to remit sins is to say "in the name of Jesus", keeping his name out of it and just having sins remitted by our varying level of faith in Jesus? We remit our own sins now? Why did Jesus tell his disciples that "whosoever sins ye remit, they are remitted..."? Can someone...

The same Peter per Acts chapter 2 that said be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins used the name of Jesus Christ to heal the lame man per Acts chapter 3. Was that an accident or was it done on purpose? Do you refuse to use the name of Jesus Christ in water baptism for...

Was this Peter's "mantra"???... 6 Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk.... 16 And his name through faith in his name hath made this man strong,... ....or was speaking Jesus' name by faith the...

This may be able to help you understand the bible. It is a 10 lesson overview of the entire thing. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8TPgIyWJX8iig3mcGl8au4W5tkD0QQ9S You are welcome to watch it if you wish. I created this video series this spring. God bless.

You skipped the middle of Acts 2:38..."in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins"... I saw that. You are anti-Jesus' name. You know that it is the name of Jesus that remits sins, but there is something inside you that wants to remove the name of Jesus from remitting folks' sins...

Here is the test... What is the name of the son per Matt 28:19? A....Son. B...Jesus. C....none of the above. Just pick one only.

The apostles always and only baptized in the name of Jesus for the remission of sins. Again, this has nothing to do with the Godhead, because many that don't think Jesus is God but only the messiah etc, use the titles and refuse the actual name of Jesus. I am not oneness. I am not...

Some say the name of the son per Matt 28:19 is "son". I'm sure Jesus and Mary would disagree.

That is what the forum is all about. Share thoughts and disagree civilly.

Well, I understand. There are about 3 billion men with the titles "father" and "son" on our planet. Just saying "father" or "son" is not the qualifier during baptism to remit sins. "Jesus" must be verbalized to qualify remission of sins.

edit

That has no bearing on the Godhead beliefs. Jw's are not trinitariams, but also skip Acts 2:38. So do unitarians etc.