Search results

They understood ancient Greek far better than the modernists today. The evidence is the endless redefinitions they propose.

...so says the man that has no pure word of God which he preaches.

Rev 19 11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on his head were many crowns; and he had a name written, that no man knew, but he...

The dispersion of the Jews is not the 2nd coming. Jesus did not return in the dust clouds of the Roman horses...LOL

I don't care what those pre RCC fathers said. I compare Zech 14 to Rev 19(and 20). It is the exact same event depicted with various descriptions. It gives a very good understanding of the 2nd coming and the reign of Christ for 1000 years(Rev 20). We need no extra Biblical commentaries to see...

Zech 14 is Rev 19. Same scene. They both describe the 2nd coming of Christ with the saints. Rev 19 describes the destruction of antichrist and false prophet, inculding 1st resurrection scene and Zech 14 further describes the takeover of the world's inhabitants by Jesus Christ, even forming one...

14 Behold, the day of the Lord cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee. 2 For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the...

Geneva and Bishops were used. More...Printed English Bibles Before the King James Version

This is not about heaven or hell if you don't have or read a certain translation. The trouble is with the one that misrepresents God's word. That entails the translator. Folks can be saved with no Bible as long as their instructor tells them the truth.

A couple of close ones, but not the election process one.

The Greek copies and copies of copies from the original autographs. The ancient English language was good for ancient Greek to be translated to. Modern Greek redefinitions are corrupt.

It speaks of those at the return of Christ that mistreat his brethren.

Since the pure word of God does not exist, are our Bibles a combination of God's pure word and man's fallible word to be trusted enough to tell folks to have faith in? Or, are we modern "decoders" on an endless search to figure it out as we preach the fallible word?

So, the pure word of God is lost, correct?

Which of the modern translations are the pure word of God?

Which one is the pure word of God?

No, you better find a Bible you believe is the pure word of God instead of inventing God's "pure" word yourself.

Fake Greek redefinitions from your buddy. Another dummy assertion is "Easter", which fake Greekists think that the 400 year old word meant "pagan rite". It mean "1st century Christian pasha feast" to the translators of the KJV. Stop watching fake news.

No, I said the goats are probably the unbelievers that attacked and assisted the attack on the Jews at Ez 38. Sorry about the misunderstanding.

Having 50 ancient translators coming together, electing words and verses from an ancient language is superstition? It sounds like logic to me.