Search results

16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved... Bummer?

The devils believe in the son of God. So do Acts skippers. The devils tremble at Jesus name. So do Acts skippers, (which tremble at the very thought of having Jesus' name invoked over them in baptism as per Acts 2:38). The devils cannot believe and be baptized per Jesus' command in Mark...

Paul never wrote a word to sinners, only to saints. The Acts skipper pastors need to teach Acts skippers what an epistle to saved saints is. Acts skippers hijack the saints' letters and give them to sinners with Acts 2:38 hidden behind their back in their tricky hand. How sneaky and devious...

The book of Romans was written to sinners?

Almost perfect, but not quite. ...we in the New Testament look back by faith in the crucified Messiah. Salvation is and always has been faith in Christ. Add baptism to faith.... 16 He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved....

I did not want to overwhelm you with sctiptures since you cannot even comprehend this... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

Acts 2:38 is a perverted water God? Yikes. 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

The horse is not dead as Acts skippers are making it out to be. Acts 2:38 will always be the only way for sinners to get free from the Law as their sins are remitted in the church age. The Law defines sin. Disobedience of Acts 2:38 emulates the Law in a sinners life. Anyone that does not...

No, you skipped Acts and went straight into the epistles to the already saved saints and stole their affirmation of faith, giving it to sinners as a plan "B" for the salvation process. Acts skippers are taught to do this from birth.

I see you refuse to answer if Rom 10:9 is written to saints OR sinners. Busted. You know the truth...it was an affirmation of the saints' faith, not a redo of the salvation process. You are guilty for hiding what you know.

I see you don't understand dispensationalism at all.

No, the promise was in Gen after the garden to bruise the devils head... The promise is AKA Grace. Promise/Grace and Law co-exist. Sinners are under all of God's Laws right now. Only saints are free from the Law. If a saint backslides, he backslides back into the Law. Did you know this?

The devils also simply believe and tremble. You saved them with your gospel of anti-baptism. The only thing that differentiates mankind with the devil is baptism. Mankind can be baptized upon believing.

I am in the church of the 3000 of Pentecost. You are in a modernist fringe church that refuses the 3000 as their model.

Amen, and so are alot of Catholics;)

The first resurrection... 6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years...... 5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand...

The RCC does not baptize per Acts 2:38, Peter, the 3000 at Pentecost and the rest of the book of Acts. They sprinkle infants without saying the name of Jesus. The RCC is only getting babies furious.

I am not saying the Acts skippers will be going to hell, just that they will not be part of the first resurrection. They still have a chance to be judged according to their works as compared to the Law of God per Rev 20 at the white throne judgement. They can try pleading insanity for skipping...

5 When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. Why did they get rebaptized if Paul did away with baptism?