Search results

I'm not trying to claim that the word can only be used in the negative sense. I'm saying we can discern that because the judging of the dead is contrasted with the rewarding of "thy servants the prophets, and to the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great". Plus, we can see that...

Those verses all describe people who are clearly not believers as being resurrected. Deny it if you want, but it IS very clear in all of those verses. I disagree. Those verses are very clearly talking about bodily resurrection and it is certain that believers would not be described as being...

If I was you I would want to only spend time making false personal accusations instead of discussing the scripture, too. Because scripture is not on your side. I have dealt with the scripture and you know it. You just want to run away whenever you don't have any answers.

You made a false claim and that's a fact. After someone said "We are quickened in the Spirit", you said "That particular wording is not used in scripture regarding the concept of being born again.". And then I showed where the word is used in relation to being born again. Ephesians 2:4 But...

LOL. Nice dodge. The Pharisees expected the Messiah to rule on earth just like Premils do. Instead, He rules from the right hand of the Father in heaven. His kingdom is not of this world (John 18:36) and does not come with observation (Luke 17:20), but Premils can't accept that.

No, it didn't. Did you not read my post? I didn't get around to reading this thread right away because I was reading other threads and doing other things. Is this too hard for you to understand that your posts are not my top priority to read? Are you seriously trying to criticize me for not...

LOL. You again are being a hypocrite by accusing someone else of ridiculous arguments after you've made so many ridiculous arguments yourself. Anyway, I don't recall saying that the word translated as "stand" can't ever be used figuratively. But, the bottom line here is that scripture is very...

Those who have part in His resurrection are spoken about in Revelation 20. You are trying to change "the first resurrection" into something different than what other scripture says is the first resurrection (Christ's resurrection). You need to learn to interpret scripture with scripture...

Obviously. I was simply correcting your false claim. After someone said "we are quickened in the Spirit", you said "That particular wording is not used in scripture regarding the concept of being born again.". And then I showed you that the word quickened is used in scripture regarding the...

I didn't say it was just in Revelation 19. I agree that there are other places where it is described. How so? There is nothing in 2 Peter 3:7 or 2 Peter 3:10-12 to indicate that it's anything but literal, physical fire that will come down upon the earth when Christ returns. But, I'm not saying...

I don't say that Israel has replaced the church or anything like that, so if you're just going to misrepresent what I believe, then I'm not interested in that. Not with bodies. That's something you're making up. It's only their souls that are in heaven, which is why John only sees the souls...

In Revelation 11:18, John differentiates between those who are judged/condemned and those who are rewarded. It is unbelievers who will be judged. The word means to be condemned in that verse. In contrast to "your servants the prophets and your people who revere your name" who will be rewarded...

How does Amil replace Israel with the church? God's people have always been those who have faith. In OT times that was mostly Israelite people but then Jesus shed His blood so that Gentile believers could also be God's people together with Israelite believers. No one was replaced. Instead...

Yet, scriptures like Daniel 12:2, John 5:28-29 and Acts 24:15 very clearly indicate that unbelievers will be resurrected.

If the sword coming out of Christ's mouth is symbolic, which it obviously is, then that means the destruction it causes is described symbolically as well. Very simple. So, no, it's not talking literally about birds eating raw flesh any more than it's talking about Jesus literally impaling and...

So, where did Jesus answer the question the disciples asked about when the temple buildings would be destroyed if not in Luke 21:20-24?

I didn't say it was. Please try to pay attention to what is actually being discussed instead of making assumptions which make you look bad and make you look like you have no reading comprehension skills. It was claimed that the word "quickened" is "not used in scripture regarding the concept...

The marriage supper might be prepared in heaven, but that doesn't mean it takes place there. Jesus will be coming down from heaven to meet us rather than us meeting Him there. What you're saying doesn't explain why we wouldn't just meet Him in heaven rather than "in the air" if we were just...

Was my question too difficult to understand? Let me try again. Were you saying you think the two witnesses will experience God's wrath or was I misunderstanding you? Please don't answer a question with a question. Please just answer the question.

I agree that He was asked two different questions about two different things, but I disagree with some other things you said here. I disagree that the birth pain signs (wars, earthquakes, famines, etc.) would all occur before the fall of Jerusalem. Jesus indicated that those would be signs of...