Search results

Why would one of the top Bible scholars of his day make such remarks of manuscripts considered the “oldest and best” by others? Burgon had personally examined these two manuscripts, and noted that their text differed greatly form that of 95% of all manuscripts. When examining the Gospels as...

Sinaiticus has also been corrected by “…at least ten revisers between the IVth and XIIth centuries…”13 The Codex Sinaiticus Project readily admits: No other early manuscript of the Christian Bible has been so extensively corrected. A glance at the transcription will show just how common these...

Read the article, not pound your fist on the keyboard.... Tischendorf gives his personal testimony: It was at the foot of Mount Sinai, in the Convent of St. Catherine, that I discovered the pearl of all my researches. In visiting the library of the monastery, in the month of May, 1844, I...

I gave you the info and you responded without reading it. Typical multiversionist. Also, they are attributing to the hundreds of new sects of Christendom that have their own custom made biased "word of God".

The Unreliability of the Alexandrian Manuscripts - Preserved Word Ministries

Yes, Christianity is wrecked. The KVJ stood as the authority for God's word alone for over 300 years. If sinners repented, they picked up a KJV to teach themselves. Rebel forces of anti-KJV persons began working on multiversionism projects, like Strongs etc, in the 20th century. They started...

It was found in a garbage can a long time ago and reused by a curious scholar.

No, I said the enemy won. Sinners think there is no pure word of God now, and they are off the hook. Scriptural critics and redefiners wrecked Christianity.

...a little too open.

You're welcome. You too.

Excellent post.

Because they were used by the KJV translators and they match each other. The modern versions are based on a rejected, Alexandrian text that was riddle with mistakes. This text was used by the enemy to debunk the Bible as a mistake prone mess to the world. The enemy won.

Multiversionism is the new age Bible version syndrome that has excited the masses into translation hysteria with the latest and greatest "word of God".

I was saved at 18 years old in 1979, and never had a problem understanding the KJV. I did not need modernists to define "thee" etc to me. Since then, I have never met a student of mine that could not understand it either. I think folks that go around saying it is too hard to read are just...

I only use the KJV for reading and teaching. It was translated in ancient times before all the Greek "redefinitions" came along to slice up the Bible's meaning into bite sized segments. It stood alone for 300 years, then along came "you know who" to create hundreds of translations to stump...

More than the modern bibles used. If I had a PHD, would you trust me to make you a perfect translation? If not, who is your favorite modern translator?

It was special because of the election process via 50 ancient translators.

The ancient manuscripts that neither of us have access to are purely copied, or rejected as needed. Because they did not have a copier back in those days.

...which is a bunch of hubbub.

Just saw this. The pure word of God was original manuscripts that were copied by skilled copyists over the centuries as the originals disintegrated. They are now copies and copies of copies.