Search results

16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.) What do you need, Roman Catholic, a 2000 year old video? LOL

The protestants are the daughters of the RCC. They protest Mama. The RCC protested the 3000 of the Acts 2:38 Church beginning at Pentecost. There are 2 Mamas... #1 Mama Pentecost...The Acts 2:38 Church, which is the original Church and only Church of Jesus. #2 Mama RCC...The great falling...

Actually, Jesus, as his understanding of the future is, said Matt 28:19 to keep the goats out of the flock of the Acts 2(38) church. He foresaw the rise of the RCC and her daughters that forbid and despise the name of Jesus Christ per water baptism. The Acts 2:38 church is exclusive and for...

Which excommunicated heretics that the RCC removed are you referring to?

If you agree with Peter and the 3000 at Pentecost per Acts 2:38, then why aren't you baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of your sins yet?

I get what you are implying here.... Jesus said this... 19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Peter said this... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus...

If I may.... The Roman Catholic cannot see that folks in the book of Acts were always and only baptized in the name of Jesus Christ, and no mention of "Father/Holy Ghost" ever being eluded to? Are you still teaching folks NOT to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of...

Yes, it would be akin to me teaching on the gifts of the Spirit without having the Holy Ghost. Not cool.

You hurt me in a bad kinda way, fella.:cool:

The name of the son per Matt 28:19 is "YHWH"? Please show me a verse in the NT that has the disciples baptizing in the name of "YHWH"? If there is no verse, you are telling a whopper.

Amen, the name Jesus commanded them to use per the son in Matt 28:19 is "Jesus", specifically. This is why the book of Acts uses ONLY the name of Jesus during baptisms. Modern Christendom has a completed NT but will not read it.

Do all Catholics teach that the specific name of the son per Matt 28:19 that Jesus commanded to be baptized in is "son"? Are they parrots or disciples? A parrot would parrot the words of Jesus instead of actually baptizing in the name of the son.....:rolleyes:

Think is our brain at work.

The name of the son per Matt 28:19 is "son"? Now that is the definition of dense.

Amen..."anything nut in the name of Jesus,... anything". The thought of that name spoken over them in baptism just sickens them. That is the last thing in life they would want to do. Weird.

Before they teach the church they must join the church via obeying Acts 2:38, agreed?

Excellent post!

Thank you for your honesty. Now, please tell the rest of the class that Jesus was telling the disciples this.... 19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son(Jesus), and of the Holy Ghost: As Peter understood and did, beginning in Acts...

Catholic....what is the name of the son that Jesus commanded the disciples to baptize in per Matt 28:19? Is the name "son"? Is your name "son"? Do you write "son" on your official documents? Shall I call you "son" from now on? If not, why not?

They run from the name of Jesus Christ. They tremble at the thought of being baptized in Jesus name, too. Yikes!