Search results

No, there is no division in the Law. Man made that whopper up. It is called “partial Law” teaching. Totally unscriptural

I did address the OP

He is released at the last portion of the millennial reign to challenge the Lord. The dead that were not part of the first resurrection are raised after the end comes.

If we are Spirit filled and led, the OT Laws have no significance in our lives. They cannot be used to please God, nor can they be used to obtain righteousness(or even judge us). They are moot.

Those that are concerned about the commandments are likely under the Law. Saints are free from the Law, the unsaved are not.

Truth7t7 get's stressed out in debates.

The rest of the dead are not participants in the 1000 year reign or any reign. They first appear at the great white throne.

Yes.... 20 And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. 2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, 3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up...

Wrong, the devil is bound for the same 1000 years(simultaneously) that the Lord is reigning on earth during His millennial reign.

To all incarnationists.... God forsook an individual, not Himself.

Which scripture? I am only commenting occasionally. It must have your attention?

A previous poster said God came as Jesus, in the person of his son. That is an actor. God did not come as Jesus but inside Jesus. How can you guys get so twisted? I know. The Catholic Church taught you that.

Jesus was made a quickening spirit upon his resurrection per 1 Cor 15. A quickening spirit raises the dead as God does. So, Jesus was made God(a quickening spirit).

Jesus is indeed God. He was made God by his God. Since God cannot be seen, He must be seen through His human son, making His son God by default.

36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. What about it?

I use the KJV only and I am not a trinitarian.

You too my friend.

That was the craziest translation I ever saw!

Great post. I think those that oppose Acts 2:38 just do not know what the name of the son is. That puzzles them to the point that they even disobey Jesus in Matt 28:19 and do not baptize in the name of the son at all. It is like they are spiritually dyslexic.

9 For in him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily