Search results

  • Welcome to Christian Forums, a Christian Forum that recognizes that all Christians are a work in progress.

    You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  1. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Nice try, but that does not resemble what Paul said... 12 Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling.
  2. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Which was symbolic of the future lamb to be buried in a tomb for 3 days. Just like the sacrifices were. They all fell short of making the comers perfect. This is why the disciples of John had to be rebaptized in the NAME of Jesus Christ in Acts 19. Jesus' name baptism is the fulfillment of...
  3. Truther

    The Giants

    The giants in Caanan were the descendants of Ham, Shem and Japheth.
  4. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    No, if so, then the rebaptism in the name of Jesus Christ of John's disciples would not have been necessary per Acts 19.
  5. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. The highlighted was faked? By whom? What translation correctly eliminated the highlighted? Also...which "Greek"...
  6. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Don't you think we should WORK out our salvation with FEAR and TREMBLING?
  7. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Peter did not actually say this?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. The highlighted was faked? By whom? What translation correctly eliminated the...
  8. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Paul spoke to all church members in the passage, both Jew and gentile.
  9. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    The original blocked out this?... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. ....please post the original for me.
  10. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Acts 2:38 says more than repent. Did you know that or does your mind block it out? let's take a closer look.... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
  11. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    No, you are judging the hearts. The baptized folks fall under the category of the sower. The wayside, stony, thorny and good ground folks. You are saying the folks that don't walk with God after baptism are some other unmentioned ground type that Jesus never described.
  12. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    LOL! You skipped the middle of Acts 2:38....and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins.... I caught ya!
  13. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    John preached remission of sins, but spoke of the lamb to provide remission of sins. Jesus died to provide actual remission of sins years after John died.
  14. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    You are debunking Jesus that DID NOT say "he that believeth not and is baptized"... The "believeth not" folks you are thinking of never entered Jesus' conversation. He knew that UNBELIEVERS don't get baptized. This is why he taught the parable of the sower.
  15. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Unbelievers don't get baptized. There are 4 types of "ground" instead. Stony, wayside, thorny and good ground. We cannot judge a persons heart.
  16. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Yes, the baptism of Acts is specifically in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of the 3000's sins. John did not say "in the name of Jesus Christ', therefore there was no remission of sins. This is why the disciples of John had to be rebaptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the...
  17. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Please read the highlighted, folks. Thanks.
  18. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    They ask Peter this.... 37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? Modernists say..,"Nothing!". Peter says.... 38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you...
  19. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Peter said.... 40 And with many other words did he testify and exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation. So they SAVED THEMSELVES this way... 41 Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand...
  20. Truther

    If Baptism could save then there is no need for the shed Blood of Jesus.

    Yes, and also confession. So, to believe is a physical work unto salvation and speaking a confession is also. I think the anti-baptism folks are just trying to get out of work(lazy).