Search results

You absolutely do not believe in Jer 31.... 31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them...

Here is what you think God lied to future national Israel about... 31 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: 32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by...

The KJV is perfectly fine for us all.

They don't care because they have been taught that God became a sperm cell that mated with a human being's egg cell(God became human). It is hard for them to see anything else but a HUMBLE God DEvolving into a human. However, Rev 3:12 etc., debunks them, and they know it deep down inside.

I just quoted you a scripture and you call it trashing?

That is NOT what those 2 verses say or meant. They were saying messiah must come as a man, not a Spirit/man.

Which is perfectly illustrated here... 19 To wit, that God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto us the word of reconciliation. And all this time you thought it said God was manifest INTO flesh?

The gnostics said Jesus walked the earth as a God/man(Spirit/flesh). The incarnation concept was born.

Repost... 19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? And He began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and...

I reject your concept of the Bible per your commentary.

You just debunked this... 19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? And He began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by...

No, you are defending the ancient gnostics now. It does not say GOD came in the flesh, it speaks of the man Christ Jesus, you know the man that defecated like men do, etc.... By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God...

I am just reading your Bible to you through your bias. Your reaction is typical.

Again, you teach replacement theology which also teaches God breaks His promises and lied to the fathers.

No, he was MADE God, not "became" God. Nor can a Spirit God become a man... 19 God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man, that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good? Jesus was a man/son of man.

Yes it is. Commentary is not for us...it is deceitful.

No, not the Bible, but the commentary has secret doctrines.

But if God became a man, then God mediates unto Himself...unless Jesus is not a part of the Godhead. Can't have both.

No, that commentary renders it obsolete.

It says "Holy Bible" on the front cover.