Search results

I would not call anti baptism Christians heretical, maybe crazy, but not heretical. Rejecting remission of sins is crazy

I can’t imagine taking up arms against Acts 2:38. Crazy, Ernest t, crazy Christians

....debunking Acts2:38

Excellent post. The real deal is, they want to be closet translators themselves, from the seminary grad to the newbie. They care nothing about preserving God’s infallible word.

The original documents don’t exist. Do you think God’s perfect word still exists without the originals? Are copies good for it? Paul thought so, per Timothy’s copy.

Yes. It is the plum line. Thank God there is a plumb line translation huh? If not, the word of God would be translated into oblivion

Why did you get bored with the KJV and hop the fence into endless translation land? Must you believe everyone that espouses a new redefinition of a Greek word? Shall that fraud Strongs debunk the ancient translators some 300 years later as gullible believers think he was smarter than the...

No, a reboot KJV. A better one. Trying to get us to abandon it. Clever indeed

The NKJV is pretending to be a KJV.

IN THE "NEW KJV," THERE ARE 22 omissions of "hell", 23 omissions of "blood", 44 omissions of "repent", 50 omissions of "heaven", 51 omissions of "God", 66 omissions of "Lord"..... A Deadly Translation - The "New" KJV Good read about the NKJV. Terrible translation.

God thought it not robbery to be equal with God etc?

No, shouting “heretic” at someone is for Catholic persecutors at Protestant trials

I disagree. I never label folks. I used to when I could not defend my ideas at a time in my life. Now I see less knowledgeable friends do it, and I point out this is their defense mechanism kicking in. Folks shout “heretic” at each other when baffled theologically. Catholics are proficient at...

Labeling admits defeat by default

The KJV is clearly correct on who God is. The KJV does not say God has a human nature. Thank God for the KJV.

David, God is not 3. God is one Spirit, alone. No 3 person(alities) etc.

God did not become a sperm cell to mate with Mary's egg. God does not lower himself to humans, nor does God have a human nature.

No, there is no such thing as a tri-une God.

Is this argument steering off into theology?

Let's start here..... I ask anyone that has a new definition of a word they oppose in the 1611 KJV this question..... WHO wrote their new definition and WHEN did this definition get introduced?