Search results

The coin has two sides. Durbin represents the People, whether or not he personally agrees with what the People want. Paprocki represents the Church, whether or not he personally agrees with what the Church wants. Dubin's position does not force anyone to exercise a law, they want. Paprocki's...

Why do you think that was "clearly a sin"? God Bless, Taken

Omission of facts, is a sure way to keep your understanding limited. You need to make sense. Property OF SLAVES? Are People? No Person held to Service....uh huh... Persons being...slaves, indentured servants, prisoners, and some others. One State, crossing a line to Another State... Uh...

I highly doubt you are having a conversation on this thread with anyone whose Intent is to tell "outright lies", and ARE rather expressing their perspective, that you disagree with. That is questionable. Even something was said about Catholics who disagree with Catholics, was not painted as...

Being anti-lies, does not mean being anti-Catholic, nor anti-people who are Catholic. And? What does honesty have to do with a person who is Protestant or Catholic? Having different perspectives does not equal lying. What does Loving a person have to do with if the person is Protestant...

Just was going by the evidence of the current discussion. I agree with that. The point is I don't believe Protestants lump "them" selves all together, but do believe the Catholics promote lumping "them" selves all together. God Bless, Taken

Many are called to elect to choose God; Few elect to choose God; Those who do elect to choose God; God chooses them Forever; That Simple and that Permanent. Matt 22:14 1 Thes 1:4 2 John 1:2 God Bless, Taken

Agree. With BOL; People Disagree with some of the Catholic's practices of his denomination. No one accused him of not loving the Lord. No one said they did not love Catholics. He brought up the "anti" and "love"; implying what "anti" implies concerning being Against Love, implies not loving...

Agree. Considering caring for the widowed and orphans: Wives were not the head of the household. Wives and children did not provide for the family; For natural needs or Spiritually. Wives and children were not permitted to attend Temple and hear the Word of God and then Feed the Family...

In observance of the swinging door.... More sentiments from another angry little anti-Protestant... God Bless, Taken

Okay, God Bless, Taken

The parallel concept is ~ we teach our young children bit by bit, as they are prepared to receive information about certain things. It's like introducing a child to counting, such an abstract thing, that does not apply to only a certain thing. But yet we show them, tell them book, and a book...

WHEN does a law become VOID? You first have to know WHEN a law IS applicable; and TO WHOM. WHEN did Mosiac Law APPLY TO a Gentile? It didn't. So a Mosiac Law can not become VOID to a Gentile. WHEN prophetic laws ARE FULFILLED, they become VOID. Now it becomes a bit more complicated ~...

Funny. God Bless, Taken

The US Constitution so drafted Expressly Defined the Relationship Between the Federalist Government and the State Governments. One of the Expressly Defined terms For the Federalist Government to Govern was PROPERTY, leaving one State and entering another State, without the authority of the...

His position is, He read, others should read, and come to HIS understanding, that he can not expound on how he concluded HIS OWN understanding. God Bless, Taken

That is not the point and you know it. Stating something without Understanding is the point. Your tid bit of your understanding, is the Constitution PROTECTED SLAVERY....and you could expound no further. So, we'll leave your understanding at that... However the TRUTH is; The US Constitution...

Living in the end times <---- OP It is always an "end time" for someone. Everyone with a natural (blood) life shall die. What was foretold from the beginning of mankind has and shall continue to come to pass. There SHALL be a Great Change upon the Earth, and of all of mankind that has ever...

So why did the US Constitution spell out any CONCERN of property of people of "one" STATE, being found in "another" STATE ?

Of course I can read. Whooo hooo I can read, you can read. Whoopie! You do not know reading is only the first step? Understanding WHAT one reads is where we disagree. Who can provide YOUR UNDERSTANDING, but you? So again, be precise in your understanding. You said your Understanding is the...