Search results

The common objection "you risk executing an innocent person" excuse has created 2 things: It elevates man's sense of fairness above God's clear commandments. The result is that thousands of the guilty manipulate the 'system' and go free to kill again. By refusing to execute ANY for fear of...

That old snake omitted 3/4 of my post to make himself look good in his own eyes rather than being obedient to the Lord of Glory.

I was right there with you tight up until your last sentence. Amil is false.

Ask yourself: Since the Industrial Revolution over 120 years ago or more; what single commodity has made men the richest? I say, and history proves, it was oil. Who controls world oil production in the Middle East? All I am saying is the entire world is beholden to the Muhlahs for oil. Without...

That is a lie from the pit of hell. Christ said: For God so loved the world that whosoever BELIEVETH in Him should not perish but HAVE everlasting life. No baptism. No works. Christ alone by faith alone.

How dare you twist Scripture to support an ungodly doctrine of works salvation. Evil indeed.

You don't think? By executing both those people they were prevented from offending repeatedly. THAT'S a deterent. You mention it took 20 years.That is not an argument against deterent; it is an illustrative argument AGAINST indefinite appeals. Plain as day: Ecclesiastes 8:11 says ," Because...

Nope. The city on 7 hills is Constantinople/Islamabad and the Great Whore is Mohammedanism and the AC is the coming Mahdi.

That's perhaps the most convoluted line of thought I think I have ever read.

Riiiight. Greasy grace huh? Sounds like something a Pharisee would say. Thank you Lord that I am not like THOSE PEOPLE. I tithe, go to church and give to the poor.

I noticed you only provided opinion and no Scripture but tried to chew me out for same. Therefore: hypocritical. No infant can profess faith in Christ before baptism therefore pedobaptism is heresy. Just because some people in the early centuries taught it was OK does not in any way justify it's...

Pretty sure I said God. Did you see something different?

Yes. It does matter. And no. God's hand does not bless a collection of fraudulent documents claiming to be His words. You are stuck on propagating the fraud yourself. The LXX is a fraud. Go back and reread my post.

You are funnier than Scooby Doo. I wrote 3 sentences. Show me where I said 7 year tribulation or 3rd coming. Oh that's right!!!! I didn't. So now you need to repent for lying.

I weary of people who misuse Scripture. "God hath not appointed us to wrath" has no relation to the rapture. In context it is speaking of the salvation of our souls.

There is not now nor ever has been a singular document known as "the Septuagint " or "the LXX.". Sinaiticus, Vaticanus and Alexandrinus are all fraudulent. They contain impossible ages for Methusalah and other antediluvian fathers. They contain spurious additions to Scripture like extensions...

False.

Augustine taught baptismal regeneration and pedobaptism. Both are heresy. Teach heresy = makes you heretical. Claim8ng my statement is only opinion while defending the same in another = hy po critical.

That's like asking the Gambino if he was an upstanding citizen. What you have done is expose the ridiculous lengths these "scholars" will go to defend the fraud. "Follows the LXX ...even when it differs". I will see your AI defending the LXX and raise you the TR against the LXX. The LXX...

Well I suppose you would naturally need to change the word so it supports your view, huh? Lots of people do that. (Rant coming) They change (sodomy) into (sexual sin) so they can avoid the implications of the correct word. Not saying you are a (sodomist); but it's the first thing to come to...