Search results

At the end of the day you can't change history. Islam invaded the Iberian peninsula. And the Christians took it back and won. Praise be to God.

I'm sorry but your misrepresenting what I said. I'm not Catholic nor did I ever say the apostles were Catholic. What i did say is that the early church believed in baptism. Thanks for sharing your opinion

Well they would of been stupid to launch even one nuke cos the USA would of turned their country into a thermonuclear wasteland within moments

It's a nice ornament for your house, especially if you like to watch birds :bigCeeze

Their nuclear capability would have been very limited. If they had launched just one nuke, Israel and USA would of smashed them. They know this. My guess is that they would of used the nukes as a tactical defense strategy, like most other countries with nukes do. "Attack or invade us and we...

That's cool. Quakers are popular pets. I'd prefer it if they let his wings grow so he can fly around like a bird supposed to.

I gotta say, for the modern interpretation of born again, at least that's a much better explanation than the one people usually use which is amniotic fluid. Still, it's connection to being born of water and spirit is not as strong as the water and spirit of baptism is, its very implicit. The...

Yea they recreated it just for show. When people are too dishonest to answer a simple question and keep repeating illogical statements then I figure they're not trying to have a discussion in good faith and I just ignore their nonsense. For example his admitted that the reconquista was...

:woot: :woot::woot::woot::woot::woot::woot::woot:

Video unavailable in my country

VIVA A RECONQUISTA :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot::woot::woot::woot::woot:

You asked me to prove that the early church believed in baptism. I did that by supplying 1 catholic source and 7 non catholic sources. I asked you to prove that the early church didn't believe in baptism. You supplied no sources at all. Fact - The early church believed in baptism You have...

LoL. Noooo Your changing the goal posts and being the liar now my friend. You said That was your response to me saying "The early church interpreted being born again as involving baptism" You asked me to prove that the early church believed in baptism. I did that by supplying 8 different...

Don't be sorry. Your embarrassing yourself, not me. You have no evidence to show that the early church didn't believe in baptism. Show me some evidence then?

At this point your just embarrassing yourself now. Its a fact the early church believed in baptism. I produced 8 various sources with quotes from the early church leaders. You've produced nothing that says otherwise. No one is disputing the fact apart from you who haven't produced any evidence...

I hope she pulls through. Keep me posted.

I was asked to give proof that the early church, from the 2nd to 5th Centuries AD, believed in baptism. I did that well and truly by supplying 8 sources.

You asked for proof and I gave you proof from two sources, a non catholic source and a catholic source so your rejection, because of your anti Catholic view, is invalid. Those proofs are from early church fathers and early councils, 2nd-5th centuries AD, and were quoted from their writings...

@JimKnox And it's not just those guys. Hippolytus 217AD Recognitions of Clement 221AD Cyprian of Carthage 253AD 7th Council of Carthage 256AD Cyril of Jerusalem 350AD Athanasius 360AD Basil the Great 375AD Ambrose of Milan 381AD Gregory of Nyssa 382AD Gregory of Nazianz 388AD The Apostolic...

If it wasn't your opinion then whose opinion was it? What church denomination is this opinion from?