Search results

The reader must not of read Genesis, the Gospel and Revelation Or he/she read but does not believe and/or understand

Always remember the number 3 = for it is the Number of ELOHIM

OT temple was destroyed by GOD A NEW TEMPLE was Resurrected 2,000 Years ago and TODAY GOD's Temple continues to be Built UP with Living Stones.

Actually, it is the physical evidence of God's promise that HE Declared in Genesis. CORRECT However, Revelation chapter 20 BEGINS ANEW with the First Resurrection = The Resurrected Saints LIVE & RULE for 1,000 Years w/CHRIST

Romans 3:4 Let God be true, and every man a liar. As it is written: “So that you may be proved right when you speak and prevail when you judge.”

Truth Time Men lived over 900 years Methuselah lived 969 literal years - that's just a mere 31 years short of 1,000 years The literal 1,000 years are promised by God and are soon coming in Glory for those who know and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Sure i do = God Said So = in Genesis and then in the Gospel and then in Revelation It's never a good thing to doubt what God has Said.

You don't know then!

The Gospel is the Biblical support to that which Genesis Claims.

i never denied a 'bodily resurrection' You claimed our resurrected bodies will be physical. The Holy Spirit Says different. But someone will ask, “How are the dead raised? With what kind of body will they come?” 36You fool! What you sow does not come to life unless it dies. 37And what you sow...

Post the verse in 1 Corinthians chapter 15 that shows we are resurrected in physical bodies.

All that you mentioned

Does not the Gospel contain all?

Is the Gospel the Kingdom of God?

Did you read chapter 15?

No, not my pov but the POV of the Holy Spirit Please read 1 Cor chapter 15

When was the last time you read 1 Corinthians chapter 15

You are avoiding the truth in Genesis.

Maybe

Well now, not any one of us can truly SEE unless we submit to God and ask God in faith. God also gave to us basic reading skills thru His words in Genesis. But if we begin to argue against "It is written" then we rely on our own intellectual concepts as well as that from others.