Search results

How so?

Because I can't contradict God's perfect knowledge. I can't make a choice that would alter my destination.

If God knows everything, including all of the choices we will make in this life, he already knows who will be saved and who will be damned. Not only do we not have freewill, but we are also pre-judged even before we are born.

Not yet. Wouldnt surprise me if he gets a phone call at the very least for being a naughty, naughty, man. :funlaugh2

What was the point of saving these European countries from Hitler in WW2 if they were just going to turn around and accept colonization anyway?

Why should we trust Europe?

I thought you said you were Canadian earlier. Is everyone just allowed to change their nationally on a whim? :funlaugh2

It was a simpler time...

What specifically do you disagree with?

That's the problem with you Canadians. You can never take a joke. That's why Trump rags on Carney so much.

I'll only approve of a third term if Trump agrees to annex Canada. :jest:

Two parties so that we can pivot faster to a solution instead of being politically stuck in the mud like they are over in Europe.

This stuff is the best.

These attacks do happen and I'm not suggesting otherwise. But they are far more common in western countries, despite China having far more people overall.

Guns are banned in most nations, not just China. What about knives? They aren't banned in China. Why don't we see a knife violence epidemic in China like we do in the UK?

It means that he feels comfortable enough to do it without ending up like JFK. It means that China, like other Asian nations, is a high trust society. By contrast, America is a low trust society. You'll never see an American president riding in an open car like that because the American people...

The fact that he can ride in an open car like that without fear, speaks well of his nation.

What if the Danes decide to violate the terms of the treaty after significant American investment, including Golden Dome? It may not be likely, but it's possible. America would prefer to eliminate that variable by owning the island. I think Greenland was a separate issue from what you've laid...

The problem is about investment. If Denmark reserves the right at anytime to revoke the treaty, any kind of investment that the United States makes on the island, which would be significant, is at risk. Owning the island solves that problem. That was Trump negotiating. He had to make NATO...