Search results

The way I understand it now, as someone explained it to me, is that the father and son are two different beings with the same nature. Would you agree?

Some people seem to want to criticise it in one way or another

So what's the harm of being baptised. I don't understand people's objection to it. Jesus himself was baptised. Aren't all Christians baptised. It fullfils what the scriptures tell us to do. One must ignore these parts of scripture in order to reject baptism.

The way I understand it is that the son and the father are two different entities but with the same nature

That doesn't answer my question so I'll answer it myself. "If a person has good faith but lives a life full of bad deeds and unrepentant sin, will he be saved just on faith alone?" No. Here is the scriptural evidence. James 2:26 faith without deeds is dead 2 Corinthians 5:10 For we must all...

Hello my neighbour in SA Welcome to the forum James writes to the 12 tribes but doesn't say his teaching does not apply to gentiles. Can you please answer this. If a person has good faith but lives a life full of bad deeds and unrepentant sin, will he be saved just on faith alone?

I've seen that guy a few times. He represents Poland in the EU and has been outspoken about Islamic immigration. Poland chooses to preserve their culture and identity and they have no terrorism because of their policy against Islamic immigration. They can call me a racist, I don't care, a...

Australia is pretty bad. They let in over 3,000 immigrants per week. All from non Christian nations. We don't even have enough accommodation or jobs for our own citizens let alone them. But they call you a racist if you critize it

Next door, in Portugal, they also let in many immigrants in the recent past. They used to have really strict rules to preserve their culture and identity. Now they have a right wing government and they are strict again. Immigration can only come from other Portuguese speaking countries, strictly...

@Grailhunter I think some confusion arises when talking about evolution. It should really be defined at the start of any conversation about this. I'm not disputing that evolution happens. I'm disputing the "theory of evolution" and the two main claims that it makes 1. That all life evolved...

True, I think they call that the "fine tuning" argument. I think we actually agree with eachother more than we realised. We both agree that any kind of evolution happens due to God and not by random materialistic processes. Would you agree with that?

So your saying that changes is animal species was driven by God. Not by random selection as science says? Because if so that not what the theory of evolution says. And is closer to what I believe

@Grailhunter I never said everything in the bible is true so can you please stop trying to strawman me with flat earth and stick to the topic of evolution. Please Science says we evolved from monkeys. It says God doesn't exist. So do you admit that science is wrong at least in some part?

Metaphorical

Because science says we evolved from monkeys. It says God doesn't exist. So do you admit that science is wrong at least in some part?

You still strawmanning me. This is all metaphorical stuff your quoting. None of it is literal. Man has known the world is a globe since the ancient Greeks and Egyptians

True, the more they look into the cell the more complicated they realise that life is. This makes more improbable that any species can evolve from another through random events.

Strawman. I'm not arguing flat earth, I've said this multiple times now. Besides, bible doesn't say the earth is flat anyway My point was that teaching the theory of evolution as infallible, pulls people away from God, as it did with me. And that they should listen to the other side of the...

Because "faith without deeds is dead". As James said. If a person has good faith but lives a life full of bad deeds and unrepentant sin, will he be saved just on faith alone?