Search results

I watched it. I still wouldn't be getting close to one. Our suburban mammals are kangaroos and koalas. Your suburban mammals are mountain lions and bears. That's insane

No, just clearing up your misinterpretation.

Not bothering humans unless their hungry or startled... I think it's safer taking a walk in the Aussie bush than in the North American forrest.

I said we don't have wild cats or bears that will hunt down humans to eat. Off course we still have other animals that will hunt and kill humans to eat. Crocodiles, sharks and dingo's. So beware

I agreed with you already on this topic. Yet here you are continuing to be hostile and antagonistic

That's insane. Maybe waiting to pounce on a child. And you guys think Australia is bad. We don't have wild cats or bears that will hunt down a person to eat

I don't understand it how people say "I'm saved", as if it's already happened. Using passed tense grammar to describe something in the future. Salvation only occurs after death. Only then can one say "I'm saved". What people really mean is "I'm going to be saved". That is the correct grammar...

GO APOLLO

At the end of the day people should be able to choose if they want to take a vaccine or not... It is totally wrong to be forced or coerced into taking a vaccine by the government, media, big pharma, work places or anyone else. It is wrong to loose your job for not taking a vaccine. There is...

Some people are just hostile, they love to argue. Even after I've agreed with them they continue with their bickering and antagonising. :no reply:

How about this then... No translations allowed. Only Hebrew OT and Greek NT can be read...

You gave two great examples. The kid in the supermarket and the kid in the car. This is what I would do. First I would get their attention and use stern words "you better settle down and behave or else I'm going to punish you when we get home" These stern words may be all that's needed for some...

That can also be done without resorting to corporal punishment. That's what I'm saying. We can at least try non-violent punishments first before resorting to spanking the child I agree. Different kids are going to respond to different punishments. What's so insane about that? Heaps of...

Yea but the same result could of been achieved by locking him in his room for a while or taking away his favourite toys for a while. There is no harm in at least trying non-violent punishments first

I'm not saying corporal punishment by parents is wrong. If other means of punishment have been exhausted and are not working then a good old fashioned spanking or a pull of the ear is required. I can't stand seeing those kids throw a tantrum at the supermarket. My sister and I would have never...

You cherry pick scripture to support your thoughts but ignore the ones that oppose them. I'm not saying that corporal punishment is wrong, unless the parent uses excessive force and causes major injury. It's up to the parent I'm just saying that it achieves nothing that non-violent punishments...

I was talking about parents using it. They have other means of punishment. Should schools use it? Well. Teachers don't have access to those other forms of punishment that parents have. All they can do is give them detention in which the child uses to do homework usually. So you make a valid...

I agree. Why assault a poor child when there are other non-abusive means of punishment. Most societies don't even use physical methods to punish criminals, so why use it on vulnerable children who are still learning. I think corporal punishment should only be used in extreme cases after all...

My question to you was What does spanking them actually achieve that other forms of punishment don't? You didn't answer the question I think because corporal punishment doesn't actually achieve anything that a non physical punishment already does.