Search results

If threats were made, that would be huge. But again, it's all hearsay.

:noyyd

I don't know. But what I do know is that she is implying that the Israeli government had something to do with his death. Likely to draw more viewers to her channel. Alex Jones did this for years. He was later forced to admit in court that he "plays a character" on his show. I prefer to stick to...

If we assume that Israel was responsible for Charlie Kirk's death, then I have to wonder, why didn't they go after Megyn? She's also very influential. More often than not, the simplest explanation is the correct one. The official story makes sense. Moe than that, there's a ton of evidence to...

But where is the incentive for a political assassination? Many political leaders not only question Israel, but openly condemn the country, and some even go as far as calling for Bibi's arrest as a war criminal. Those leaders are still alive, and their positions haven't changed. Charlie wasn't...

She also has no proof of an Israeli connection to Charlie Kirk's death, which is what she has been implying for over a week now.

Yeah, that's the toughest part. I hear people open them outside sometimes. :funlaugh2

Serious. I'm normally a tuna guy. But since it's a high mercury fish, I wanted to find something else. A buddy of mine recommended sardines. At first, I thought it was extremely fishy, and it kind of put me off them. But then I added mustard to them and the taste profile is more in line with...

Meanwhile, I've just discovered that sardines, mixed with mustard and mayo, is divine. :Happy:

Fair enough. I disagree.

In what way? Do you think that being anything other thabk straight makes someone mentally ill? I don't think Erika Kirk should have to wait 30 years for justice for her slain husband.

No. But that's not what you said. You implied that the killer was mentally ill because he had a trans boyfriend. I don't think that makes him mentally ill, I think that makes him gay or bisexual. Charlie Kirk shouldn't be dead either. Good luck with that. Information is leaked all the time...

It will be. Why? A formality, as you said. I can see the benefits of that. However, I don't think it's a possibility anymore, given the nature of how fast information shared now on social media.

That might have something to do with the fact that he confessed to his trans boyfriend and to hrs parents, among other things. In these kinds of cases, yes. But the pubic has a right to this information before a trial. You can't have a completely unbiased jury in any case.

I don't think so. Do you?

A verdict that doesn't satisfy the family of the victim. That's very common. I agree. Tyler's biggest mistake was committing this crime in a deep red state. Blue states build statues to the honor criminals. If he had committed this crime in the state of Oregon, they might have given him a medal...

It depends. If the evidence isn't strong enough, perhaps it is worthwhile. But in cases such as this, where the evidence us overwhelming, I would say no.

I always do. But when the evidence is overwhelming, I tend to view the party as guilty, even if it hasn't been proven in a court of law. They're wrong. If he murdered her, and lived his life as a free man, he escaped man's justice. In such a case, it's left up to thee individual to decide...