Search results

When you say "NOWHERE written", you obviously haven't read Matthew 26:28 or Hebrews 8:13 or Hebrews 12:24. Christ, the Divine Covenant Confirmer (Daniel 9:27; Matthew 26:28) fulfilled Daniel's 70th week perfectly and completely at Calvary. Your attempt to contort Christ into antichrist is the...

" FINAL BEAST KINGDOM of our future at the END of this world, per the Book of Revelation. It is this FINAL beast kingdom that is about the "ten horns" and "little horn" of Daniel 7, the beast of Daniel 2:35, Daniel 2:44, and Revelation." Evidently you're a futurist but don't know it...

What to believe? 1. Futurism's fantasies, fallacies, and follies 2. The Reformation's faith, vision, and sacrifice in delivering the True Church from spiritual darkness and oppression Need a hint? :laughing:

"Antichrist" means either or both of: 1. against Christ 2. a substitute Christ The Reformation recognized the applicability of one of those definitions to the following: “All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the...

So "two Israels" in a spiritual context is an entirely reasonable and logical expression. "Two" denotes that there is a particular distinction between one part of an entity and another part of that entity, resulting in two of the entity. "Israel" identifies the entity. The "two Israels" which...

So within your one physical Israel, are there the saved, and the unsaved?

If, as you insist, there is only one Israel, then is there any distinction between the saved and the unsaved within Israel? Or do you believe that they're all saved, not by grace through faith, but by their DNA?

Provide a link to an online source that teaches this. Have you ever heard of the New Testament of the Bible, comprised of the books from Matthew to Revelation? :laughing:

Are you implying that Calvin did not believe in the New Covenant? :laughing:

If you're not a covenantee of the New Everlasting Covenant in the Blood of Messiah the Divine Covenant Confirmer, then anything else that you read or do will avail you nothing. Calvin won't save you.

I'm a covenantee of the New Everlasting Covenant in the Blood of Messiah the Divine Covenant Confirmer. Daniel 9:27; Matthew 26:28; Hebrews 12:24; Hebrews 13:20 What about you?

Your 70th week will never arrive. :laughing: Daniel's did.

Not according to Paul. Acts 20 24 But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God. Romans 1 1 Paul, a servant of Jesus...

Would that be around the middle of your decapitated orphaned undetermined 70th week? :laughing: That's not Daniel's 70th week. His was fulfilled in the middle by Christ, the Divine Covenant Confirmer, at Calvary. The Judaean Christians fled Jerusalem prior to 70 AD, in response to the...

Evidently he's another one-man cult, unable to answer the simplest question, but a self-proclaimed oracle of all truth for all time. And nothing but a waste of time.

Only those faithful and obedient to Christ and His New Covenant will be saved. For Israel, that's but a remnant. Isaiah 10:22; Romans 9:27 Everything to do with Scripture; nothing to do with Amil. Blessings.

Peter was not writing to OT elect. The OT had already been taken away at Calvary (Hebrews 10:9) some 30 years previously. Peter was writing to NT Elect, they alone sanctified by "the Blood of Jesus Christ". 1 Peter 1:2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through...

It was addressed to the "elect". In the NT, that describes all, both Jew and Gentile, who are in Christ. AKA His Church.

Issue a find on the string. They were for the whole Church, and were directed to the whole Church. The words "Jew" and "Israel" do not appear in Peter's epistles. Peter identifies his audience as "elect" (1 Peter 1:2). In the NT, that describes all, both Jew and Gentile, who are in Christ...

I've read the link. Nowhere is there acknowledgment in the article that Peter is writing to the Church (e.g. 1 Peter 2:5,9), rather than exclusively Jews. However, farther down in his responses to readers' replies, he does acknowledge "Yes, 1 Pet 2:9 does indeed apply to all in the church."...