Search results

Probably the first objection people usually say is that Paul, an apostle of Christ, called himself a "citizen". The misunderstanding centers on the meaning of "citizen" and an assumed allegiance to Caesar. Acts 21:39, "But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a...

civil = relating to the community, or to the policy and government of the citizens and subjects of a state. Black's Law Dictionary, p. 311 "...citizens and subjects of a state." I wish it were true, if only to keep me out of harm's way. You have not cited the AV but some copyrighted version...

Yep. I posted it (as did Peter) in opposition to the will of man, which seems to be running rampant in this thread.

Rather, I am pandering down to a conflicted OP. That's correct, but it remains a non sequitur i.e. it does not address apostasy. We're going for the definition of the word "seal," not trying to win an argument (think OP). The issue is not at Christ's end (as you've described in length), but...

God is not a party to any "civil" marriage, as "civil" is an invention of men and does not appear in the Holy Bible. Rather, the authority being referred to in your cited passage would be Godly authority (Lawful) and not the purported authority of the State (legal). When God is removed as the...

Context is everything; isolation is nothing. And no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. (2 Peter 1:20).

The Bible does not state that Noah built the ark specifically to escape giants. However, the mention of giants (Nephilim) appears in the immediate context of the story in Genesis 6. v. 4: "men of renown" = through the idea of definite and conspicuous position; an appellation, as a mark or...

For one, we have 845 references to giants in the Holy Bible... What does scripture tell us as to the reason why Noah was told to build the ark? No, with prayer to God. He gives liberally to all who ask. He also says many do not receive because they do not ask. It's not a big deal. It's what...

Don't send them any of your money. It's our nature to believe that others will play fair, that they, too, have a sense of goodwill. But they will not and do not. A prisoner does not go to the guards to ask for an escape plan. Many people have been conditioned to think that protesting is the...

It says: ...and also after that. v.4 - There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, A misunderstanding. I was not referring to cutting and pasting; I was referring to the use of something other than the Holy Bible i.e. copyrighted versions. I don't use copyrighted...

Agreed, but we are told about that, as well: There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that... (Gen. 6:4) It's best to post the uncopyrighted word, as there are many snares intentionally set (by copyright holders) for folks like you and me. Gen. 6 God confined a portion of...

. Not "ironic" at all, given that your incessant misdirection negates any irony. Meanwhile, the posted documentation does not lie, and your utter inability to rebut it marks you a shill. .

No, not the real thing, as a testimony cannot be copyrighted. But your cites are copyrighted inventions of men who claim ownership over their inventions. Of course not. The sons of God had already done their dirty work. Now the debris of their deeds moves through to the next generation i.e. the...

For starters, you're citing altered (copyrighted) material/"versions" rather than the TR/MT/AV. "took" can also mean stolen, taken captive... v1 - Earthly women are being born, nothing unusual there. v2 - The reason why the "earthly women" were "taken" was because they were seen as "fair" by...

EUREKA! "I have found it!" "The first and major issue is that the novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (in the publication named 2019-nCoV and in February 2020 named SARS-CoV-2 by an international consortium of virus experts) is based on in silico (theoretical) sequences, supplied by a laboratory in...

...already explained thoroughly with scripture, to which you have consistently failed to respond in like manner.

Certainly, there is no "rule" concerning witnesses. But hopefully, you can discern the value of them and why there was celebration (witnesses) to a marriage - into God's family. Witnesses expose the evil that secrecy would bring. Yes, the master to which you voluntarily submitted requires that...

Scriptures, pls. It refers to a pivotal event right before the Great Flood, where the "sons of God" saw that the "daughters of men" were beautiful and took any women they wanted as their wives. They chose them, and then they mated with them.

"Marriage" implies mutual agreement, whereas, "they took them wives of all which they chose" does not. It is the bene elohim.

That's what happened. Those angels "left their first estate" (oiketerion, habitation, dwelling) i.e. they were disobedient; they rebelled. Rather, they took them wives of all which they chose.