Search results

Yeah, it's awesome how, when we utilize godly frequencies, the enemy flees. Thus, it's perfectly understandable why the enemy would pervert frequencies for his diabolical purposes...

Put on "the garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness" (Isa. 61:3) and witness the devils of depression flee.

The proof is in the posts in this thread, for all to see.

. From the OP: Precisely. It's not about geography or modern-day 'nation-states.' The word "nation" appears 147 times in the Holy Bible, where... nation = gôy & ethnos = people .

Paul made it clear in Romans 11 that there are two Israel's. We best find out who is who - now. Even my youngest daughter got it right. It's about the bloodwork of Jesus Christ -- not ethnicity or the "irresistible grace" heresy.

...or any Caesarian "state"? You're joking, right? 1) Ppl do not know who or what is Israel. 2) I’ve repeatedly encountered a particular brand of Dispensationalism (with its marketing vehicle, the “rapture”) that has formed the next phase of the ongoing synthesis between the truth of Biblical...

You haven't posted any of that - just the same ole ad hominems and non sequiturs. It would "look like" that to someone like you, who is too lazy to perform his own due diligence and rather relies on a worn out misdirection. You remain without excuse.

Few have given a clear-sighted view of the true beliefs of Erasmus. Erasmus taught Tyndale, influenced Luther, and printed a Greek New Testament that was consulted by the KJV translators. He was a multilingual Greek text editor, a man used by God to print the pure Greek New Testament which...

I agree, which is why I rather posted authentic verifiable documentation rather than hearsay and ad hominems. No, Erasmus was no "textual critic." Neither can you claim to speak for what he may have, or may not have, "love[d]". Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.

"Notes" are not equivalent to the primary (or even secondary) documentation I provided above. FYI, if you bother to look closer at your copyrighted version, you can find a second witness to the documentation posted above. Further, the "original (or oldest available) manuscripts" comment is a...

Baker Book House, publisher of half-a-dozen modern translations, also prints a bible selection guide entitled, The King James Version Debate. Author D. A. Carson admits: [T]he theories of Westcott and Hort...[are] almost universally accepted today...It is on this basis that Bible translators...

Rather, all modern translations use W-H as its basis. Two spiritualists, Westcott and Hort, changed the traditional Greek text in well over eight thousand places using the Vaticanus manuscript and other corrupt texts. In 1881, this 1% minority text type supplanted the Majority Text with its...

That's a lie on its face, as your posts evince. Spot on. Time to move on. God help us. and It has become apparent that much of your blended screed has come from that 'recommended' website, Copyright ©1992 Tony Warren, and its forum, Center for Biblical Theology and Eschatology. Merely one...

IOW, 'don't question my opinion.' You bring no scripture to your opinion. "If you can't stand the heat..." Rather, seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you. Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought...

Yeah, that Bondi act is pure theater. It's showtime for the masses. They're dialoguing us to consensus.

Again, your flip flopping falsehoods fall flat. Rather, one can simply mute the video and easily read his lips saying "no" as he points to himself and also shakes his head "no".

Q: Who is being referred to as "the sons of God"? A: The term translated "the Sons of God" is, in the Hebrew, B'nai HaElohim, "Sons of Elohim," which is a term consistently used in the Old Testament for angels, and it is never used of believers in the Old Testament (Job 1:6; 2:1; 38:7) (where...

What no one believes is your "fact-checker" faux pas.

Light makes manifest the darkness, thus, the damage-control "fact checking" frenzy has now been forced to the surface. "could be interpreted as" "plausible" "misspoke" "slurred his words" "audio quality led to a misunderstanding" ROFL @ the "fact checkers" bandwagon Georgia, you say? Well...

He did admit it. It's working fine here. LIke I said, be patient (like, for about 30 seconds) and let it load up. Anyone else (other than Button) claiming that the video doesn't work? Here's the C-SPAN link yet again of DJT saying he's not Christian...