Search results

I never said that was the case: you pinned it on me and went on the slay your own strawman. That's not my problem but yours. The context I quoted says nothing about Yerushalem. That's curious: why would you reference Luke 4:29, which was at Nazareth, when we have Gospel accounts full of...

Lying about the statement so you can say I don't understand and judge me as totally lost? I leave that between you and the real Judge. Acts 7:35-40 LSV (Literal Standard Version) 35 This Moses, whom they refused, saying, Who set you a ruler and a judge? This one God sent [as] a ruler and a...

So you also do not believe Stephen, being full of the Holy Spirit, when he says that the Torah contains Living Oracles: why should that be any surprise to me at this point?

More scrambling of Paul's words: the Torah is never called dogma in the scripture, so guess again because your interpretation is wrong. Handwritten dogmas of the Sanhedrin, Pharisees, Sadducees, Chief Priests, and Scribes. Thanks for proving what I just said about your floundering, (and...

That's the Pharisee understanding of the Torah which is of the natural mind of the natural man. If you do not walk pleasing unto the Father you walk according to the flesh, in death: and that is according to Paul in another passage already quoted. Yeah, restudy the background context where...

Neither was Yerushalem yet chosen by the Father to place His name there in the time of Abraham, and not even in the time of Mosheh. You are imposing your paradigm upon a scripture allegory. Moreover the Abrahamic covenant, including circumcision, was folded into the Torah even though...

I've already seen it and you were not there. The Gospel is to each in his or her appointed times, times appointed of the Father, and thus it is with the Bema following Acts 2, otherwise you make Paul a liar to his own congregations. Again, the kingdom of Elohim does not come with...

Obviously I do not agree with your interpretation of Rev 20. A thousand years are as one day, and one day is as a thousand years with the Master: but that cuts both ways depending how much you love the Father and His Word. The Most High made appearances twice unto Shelomoh, on two separate...

The scripture is my beliefs, and if I am speaking of one main thread running through the vine I highlight it, (for every passage has multiple themes running though it).

Apparently not so obvious to you once you come to the portion of Rev 21:1-2 which calls her the Bride. Otherwise you would not be so foolish as to ignore that statement and claim yourself to be the bride. Also the Tabernacle of Elohim, (Rev 21:3), which you are not in this respect, and neither...

Hiddenthings@, if you are going to continue rapid firing multiple posts before I can respond, I am going to consider it nothing more than trying to drown me out in my own thread, which in turn, will make you worthy of being ignored.

Yes, and the kingdom he receives pertains to the new-renewed covenant which, as already explained through the writings of Paul in Gal 4, Mat 21:4-5, and Zec 9:9, is the Daughter of Zion-Yerushalem. Again, Yerushalem of above is our mother(covenant), Gal 4:22-31, and therefore the Daughter of...

Denying even more scripture. Rev 19 was just posted with commentary. Are you not able to follow context? Revelation 19:-9 ASV 1 After these things I heard as it were a great voice of a great multitude in heaven, saying, Hallelujah; Salvation, and glory, and power, belong to our God: 2 for true...

More denial of plain scripture texts containing the Testimony of the Master. Moreover you have already admitted that the marriage and the marriage supper are not the same, (which was correct), and additionally you have quoted from Rev 19 several times, but apparently you did not notice what it...

Apparently you still haven't figured out why I posted so much from Luke 12. The response above is scripture negligence at best. There are certain key phrases that serve to link companion passages together, which makes it much easier to find them with modern search tools, and they are there to...

Ignoring your twisting of the scripture is not avoiding the truth which is actually in the scripture: the passage does not say what you say it says, for you wrote, "This cultural context provides the perfect backdrop to illustrate the delay in his coming for his wedding." Show me where it says...

??? That's not an explanation or proof: that's an empty claim without scripture evidence. Where is that found in the text? Please point it out for me. Not once you realize you are neither the bride nor the covenant. Same problem for you also in the parable of the ten virgins and several...

Why do you offer no evidence from the scripture for your claims? Put forth your interpretation of the words in Luke 12:36 and anywhere else therein from which I quoted and prove that you are correct according to the scripture. Put forth the rest of your evidence for the other claim, ("on this...

Agreed, and neither was Paul one of the twelve.

One must ignore the Testimony of the Master in Luke 12 to believe what you have chosen to believe: and yet you still choose to ignore the plain clear statement when it has been posted, quoted, and shown to you three times now. No it isn't: it is found in carnal misrepresentations of Paul's...