Search results

You’re accusing me of following man-made teaching, but I’m the one actually standing on Sola Scriptura, Scripture alone, while you're adding ideas that the Bible never teaches. I asked a simple, honest question: “So, where do you find that in the Bible?” And you didn’t answer it. That speaks...

I don’t follow Calvin, Luther, or Augustine, I follow Christ and believe what is written in the Word of God. The idea that “we all sin a little here and there and can’t help it” is not what I’m teaching. What I am saying is what the Bible says: that while we are called to holiness and must fight...

The claim that saying “those who are truly saved are kept by God’s power” is false doctrine completely misunderstands both the nature of salvation and the power of God. It’s not accusing God of failing, just the opposite. It’s trusting that God never fails to finish what He starts. Scripture is...

So, where do you find that in the bible?

In Luke 19:14, Jesus tells a sobering truth through a parable: “But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.” This is not just a historical snapshot of Israel’s rejection of their Messiah, it’s a reflection of the heart condition...

JOHN 1:1 serves as a key reference for Trinitarians because it plainly declares the full deity of Jesus Christ. The claim that “the Word was a god” is a serious distortion of the text and ignores both the grammar and the theology of the passage. While The Bible Translator journal may speculate...

At no point in my posts did I write or imply that “you can live in unrepentant habitual sin and still go to heaven.” That is not what I believe, and it's not what I’m teaching. In fact, I said the exact opposite. I made it very clear that those who continue in sin without repentance were never...

I am with the truth of the scripture crowd, Sola Scriptura, the true gospel that never teaches that someone can live in willful sin and still be secure. The Bible is crystal clear, those who continue in sin without repentance show they were never truly born again (1 John 3:6-10), therefore, they...

Ha ha, if “same old say so” is all you’ve got, then I guess the truth is still doing its job. You can say goodbye if you want, but that doesn’t change anything I’ve said, or the truth behind it. I’m not intimidated by dismissive comments, and I’m actually glad you’re reading my posts. Keep it...

Jesus said, “It is written…” in response to Satan’s temptations to show us that the written Word of God is our ultimate authority and defense against lies, deception, and spiritual attacks. Though He is fully God, Jesus was also fully man, and in His humanity, He modeled how we are to stand...

Let’s get something straight, I didn’t ask for your opinion, and to be honest, I don’t care for it either. This is a public thread, and I responded to what was posted, plain and simple. If you or someone else chooses to quote from a source and present it without full context, then yes, others...

Fun, fun, grin. Thanks for the reminder. I am finished with this foolishness, so I put him on ignore.

While many try to ignore Jesus, when He returns in power and might, this will be impossible. - Michael Youssef

That actually proves my point even more. You’re now saying that Dr. Witherington believes the same doctrine I was defending, yet you posted a quote from him that made it sound like he didn’t. That’s exactly why this confusion happened in the first place. You misrepresented what he meant by...

Let’s be clear, it’s not me who owes Dr. Witherington an apology, it’s you. You’re the one who posted the quote, “Jesus wasn’t, and isn’t, Yahweh,” without any explanation or context. That statement, on its own, sounds like a denial of Christ’s divinity. I responded to what you chose to put out...

You’re right that mistakes happen, and I agree that how we respond to them matters. But let’s be honest about where the mistake actually came from. You were the one who posted the quote, “Jesus wasn’t, and isn’t, Yahweh”, without any context or clarification. That’s a serious statement, and...

The quote you posted, “Jesus wasn’t, and isn’t, Yahweh”, was the only thing I had to go on. You didn’t provide any context or explanation when you shared it. As written, that statement directly contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture concerning the full deity of Jesus Christ (John 1:1, John...

I understand your concern, and I appreciate your acknowledgment of my sincerity. However, I want to be clear that my response was based solely on the quote that you shared: “Jesus wasn’t, and isn’t, Yahweh.” That was the only statement I had to go on, and as it was presented, it directly...

Just to clarify, the only statement I responded to was the one you posted: “As Dr. Witherington pointed out (see post #24), ‘Jesus wasn’t, and isn’t, Yahweh.’” That was not my quote, nor did I misrepresent it. I responded directly to what was presented. I don’t personally know Dr. Witherington...

Once again the so-called “Jewish law of agency” is not found in Scripture, nor is it taught as divine revelation. It is a man-made interpretive framework developed through rabbinic tradition to explain how a representative can act on behalf of another. While it may serve as a cultural or legal...