Search results

Two errors arising from modernist Darby/Scofield dispensational futurism. The 70th seven followed immediately and contiguously after the preceding 69. It was not decapitated. In Daniel 9:24-27, the Prince who came was/is Messiah, and He was crucified (cut off) in the midst of it, confirming...

Satan is certainly unsurpassed as an antichrist in his opposition to Christ, but he is not the only antichrist, as John tells us that there were already many. 1 John 2:18. The Pharisees were antichrists, as they denied that Jesus was the Christ who had come in the flesh. 1 John 2:22; 4:3; 2...

"Provide" or "devise". Excellent historical exegesis, bro.

Are you asking, "Is Satan the only antichrist"?

They don't agree with my POV. I didn't happen to have a POV when they were alive. :laughing: :laughing: Rather, I agree with their evidence. There's a diametric difference, which you're apparently incapable of understanding. The collective united empirical testimony of the historical saints...

I have the united testimony of the overwhelming majority of the historical true orthodox Christian Church on my side. You have naught but your own imagination. What to believe? No hint needed. :laughing:

What does this have to do with the Reformation, which is what we were discussing?

The quotes I cited were the claims of papal, not pagan, Rome. You quoted 2 Thessalonians 2:2-4, which identifies the man of sin. The quotes I cited, in which the pope is claimed to be God, identify him as that man of sin, confirmed by the Reformers. So Moloch et al were not the man of sin. A...

So God agrees with no one but you. :laughing:

“All the names which in the Scripture are applied to Christ, by virtue of which it is established that He is over the church, all the same names are applied to the Pope.” Robert Cardinal Bellarmine, De Conciliorum Auctoriatate (On the Authority of the Councils) Bk 2, chap. 17 “The pope is of so...

Not according to John. There were already many when John wrote, and have been many ever since. The apostate papacy was one of the many.

1 John 2:18 Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.

The Reformation recognized the little horn as the antichrist of the apostate papacy.

Who other than yourself is on your side? :laughing:

In what post do you mention "Church of God"? I think Bro. Jay is hallucinating again. :laughing:

Tell us who my true father is. With Scripture. Don't be shy. Provide an example of false abuse of other people's beliefs. Be sure to state specifically (if you can) what the belief is, and how I'm abusing it. Be sure to reference post #7. Don't be shy. History confirms the accuracy of the...

History proves Scripture. Nothing proves the future. The Reformers accurately recognized the fulfillments of the associated Daniel 7 prophecies. Why do you ignore the dogmas of an antichrist?

The Reformers saw it. Their vision was clearer than yours.

The blood of the Reformers speaks. The fallacies of futurism fail.

I'm confident that the Reformers identified the little horn correctly. They lived in the belly of the beast. They died under the depredations of the beast. There was not one dispensational futurist among them. And by God's grace and mercy, they prevailed "against the rulers of the darkness...