Search results

Simply put, the measure of the extent of the gospel that is needed is just, "Jesus is the Son of God." Simply believing this truth is all that is needed to gain everlasting life. The thief on the cross next to Christ, what was the extent of the gospel message that was preached to him? Was he...

This prophetic passage which Jeremiah penned was written around 19 years after Daniel penned the Daniel 2:24-45. It makes no sense because it was not until John penned the Book of Revelation and declared that in the seventh Bowl judgement that Babylon would be remembered once more during the...

I would recommend that people take the time to actually meditate upon Genesis 2:17 and consider the breath of its outcomes' timespan and whether or not it is still applicable to us today?

Just a small correction required above: - Jeremiah 51:14 : - 14 The Lord of hosts has sworn by Himself: “Surely I will fill you with men, as with locusts, And they shall lift up a shout against you.” You really need to begin reading Jeremiah 50 from verse about verse 33: - Jer 50:39 should...

No, we are not in agreement. Genesis 2:15-17: - 15 Then the Lord God took the man and put him in the garden of Eden to tend and keep it. 16 And the Lord God commanded the man, saying, "Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; 17 but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you...

Hello, Simply speaking Genesis 2:17 tells us that if we sin against God's statutes then in the distant future, some 7,000 plus years after this requirement/law was written, those who sin against God will die the second death. In other words, we become a candidate to die the second death in...

Some of our children will reject us outright and some will live with our quirks while others will actually love us without any reservation because we loved them first. We all cannot be unborn from our parents just like we cannot disassociate ourselves from God, our creator. Sadly, many try.

So, your best defence against anyone who questions your understanding is to use the false argument that they are the problem and that you have the right understanding by inference. Sorry Davy, your defence shows that your understand does not stack up even against the scriptures that you quote.

Davy, I do not believe that you have adequately answered my question re Christ's rule during the Millenium period. Perhaps you may like to try explaining your understanding again.

I believe that I had posed a question to Davy, as quoted above, which you replied with: - To which I responded with: - This diagram tries to explain the difference between the four different "Millenium" understandings. This diagram sort of satisfies the different understandings...

Mark, you are welcome to stick with the KJV, but I have pointed out that there are two times that H:0127 is translated as "land" in the verses that I had quoted. This is because of the mistaken belief that God had made a "forever" promise of "land" to Israel, whereas God's promise was for a...

Mark what is the outcome for a person if they turn away from God/Christ? Will their name not be found in the Book of Life?

@marks a better rendering of Deuteronomy 32:39-47 is: - 39 'Now see that I, even I, am He, And there is no God besides Me; I kill and I make alive; I wound and I heal; Nor is there any who can deliver from My hand. 40 For I raise My hand to heaven, And say, "As I live forever, 41 If I whet My...

But the Prophet Ezekiel suggested that it was possible for a righteous man to lose his salvation and not live but die the second death simply by turning away from God. There are many who believe that they are righteous but, even though they can quote many scriptures to support their POV, there...

Why do you have a need to answer for others? From my perspective there is not much difference between the two perspectives, but I was wanting Davy to explain why there is a difference.

The question is when does this "forever regeneration" take place?

Do we all really understand each other's understanding unless it is carefully spelt out?

There is a strong belief by some that Christ will soon reign upon the face of the earth for 1,000 years. Scripture suggests otherwise. I was asking for clarification of his understanding.

Oh Davy, can I ask you what type of "future reign" you or the Amills are speaking of and from where this future reign will take place? There is so much misinformation being floated around on "feelings" that confusion is presently the order of the day.

Perhaps they are the judged kings of the earth who will be judged when they assembled at Armageddon, and the description of their long hair and teeth like a lion indicates that they were in the Bottomless pit for many days awaiting the time of their release to be punished.