Search results

I've been consistently emphasizing that distinction. The error arises from those denying that the NT promises are a will, of which Christ and those in Christ are the heirs.

An NT replaces an OT. That's how wills/testaments work. Hebrews 9 makes it clear that the NT is a will/testament, hence the name New Testament. There is nothing for unbelieving national Israel in the New Testament.

The Abrahamic et al covenants are testamentary promises and bequests under a set of covers called the Old Testament. A New Testament completely replaces an old testament and all of its promises and bequests under the principles of operation of wills and testaments. This is seen in the first...

Also from the NT. Two Israels. Romans 9 6 Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel: 7 Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, They which are the...

The gifts and the calling are terms associated exclusively with those who have put their faith in Christ: His Beloved Election, His Holy Chosen People: His Church. To whom is God's calling directed? 1 Corinthians 1:26 For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the...

Keep those "forms" grammar lectures coming. :laughing:

Of course. So that, which was in the old will/testament, no longer appears in the New Will/Testament, and is thus null and void under the principles of operation of wills/testaments. Matthew 26:28 King James Version 28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the...

Yes, still in effect in Christ. You're welcome. Not in land for Israel, which appears nowhere in the New Will/Testament. Do you find it impossible to type the word "Testament"?

Referring to circumcision, everlasting ended at Calvary. Referring to land, forever ended at Calvary. What else do you need?

Still in effect in Christ.

So you're falsely claiming that you never disagreed with me. When did everlasting circumcision end? Did the Holy Spirit through Paul tell us when it ended?

Glad that you never disagreed. Glad that you never disagreed. Please tell me the difference between "everlasting" and "forever".

Glad you agree that it is in Christ alone. Glad you agree that Christ alone is the the Fulfillment of all the promises, and the Heir of all things. I showed you when "everlasting" circumcision ended. What else do you need?

Of course. In Christ. Not in Israel. Why do you insist on ignoring the word "all" in those verses?

Why are you so unwilling to acknowledge that NT Scripture is speaking of the New Will/Testament, not a covenant? And in what post number have you responded regarding 2 Corinthians 1:20 and Hebrews 1:1,2?

I don't need to defend anything. Scripture defends itself.

Unsurprisingly, you're unable to answer a simple question, which continues to demonstrate the vacuity of the modernist dispensational ideology to which you subscribe. Its racialized fallacies and fantasies can never extinguish the light of New Will/Testament Truth.

2 Corinthians 1 20 For all the promises of God in him are yea, and in him Amen, unto the glory of God by us. Hebrews 1 1 God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, 2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath...

Your commentary does not stand. It falls before the onslaught of New Testament Truth. It is antiScriptural and utterly devoid of support through centuries of historical orthodox Christianity. It is a betrayal of Calvary and the Blood of Christ the Divine Testator, in Whom are all the Promises...

Untrue. A covenant does not require the death of a covenantor. But a will/testament requires the death of the testator. Hebrews 9:15-17 does not describe a covenant. Rather, it describes the New Will/Testament. A New Will/Testament completely replaces an old will/testament. This is seen in...