Search results

It was suspected that the Origenists and that includes Arius only believed in a Godhood for Christ because it satisfied Hellenic philosophy. The Christ is ridiculously pre-existent and gives people his permanent beginning to believers. Thus, the breath of man is the hope of the permanent life...

So, you say 3 individuals with the same existence. @Grailhunter forgot the modelist trinitarians who did not separate God into 3 distinct attributes.

Just checking. A triad which has the same essence is not implied by that verse.

Not all of the trinity is unique theism. Jesus the mangod, the separation of spirit from the father entity stinks of Hellenism. So do the Arians. Don't make a figure or a model and expect to represent the invisible spirit of God.

3 ands don't change that are nouns and names for every noun phrase in baptize into the name of the father, and of the son, and of the holy spirit.

Choosing God without the threat of brute force. He doesn't want robots.

You exaggerate.

Perhaps where you live, Australia? You are nontrinitarian, and that is all. Charity towards neighbors, willingness to let your members go to college etc etc. You preach it is better to be defenseless then? The nerve. I don't care about stupid per population statistics. We have immigration...

The god of that world was YHWH of Israel. Satan is irrelevant lest you are on drugs. Herod claimed to be the voice of the God. He became the abomination that causes desolation.

They don't believe in free speech much. With this, I think the problem is more than the JWs as weak Unitarians. They have a hard time admitting they are wrong, and I don't know about their charity towards fellow mankind. I hate that they are "on my side". I believe they don't even prioritize...

That is a lie, because you know the concepts are not the same.

Mary's "permanent" [virginity] is not taught, nor is a virgin birth, but a virgin conception is. The trinity is not taught in the Greek ever, but Tyndale and others have not been corrected for their historic mistakes. In fact, Modern Rome embraces these mistakes.

The Eastern Orthodox would disagree.

You proved it was a bunch of generic nouns, congratulations. And now you need to deny Peter having a biological son. This should be interesting.

Yes, no witnesses wrote it down; and writing was not common among the gentiles, thus the real Israel disappeared without a trace, except the New Testament.

Mister Jesus defines what born above or what begun up means. The statement is not for the modern believer.

No, what is stupid is using that document from a disproven canon. It, the NT never says she had permanent virginity. You seem to not know it or quote it. The burden is on you buddy. You know the implicit evidence is about chastity and not virginity.

There weren't going to be any witnesses because he was to come like a thief in the night. But the historical implications are there.

Wow, you are proving it isn't a title by your gibberish. And what you do say about the other catholic churches.