Search results

I've never accused you of not reading stuff carefully, SI. You're asking me here, SI, to repeat myself, which you hate. We discussed this. Actually, there are a couple of things in that quote of mine, and I don't know which you are referring to in asking this question, so I'll just answer to...

I think that applies to both of us, really. Yeah, you too. Not in the sense of a "rapture." I have said several times that we will go out to meet Jesus in His return, as in loyal subjects of royalty going out to meet and escort their conquering king. In terms of what Paul says in 1...

I read everything carefully, SI. But I make mistakes sometimes ~ and so do you, and so do we all. But yes, I read everything carefully. Sure. Sin. Of course. Not to downplay it in any way, as that might sound, but yes. Okay, but really, what even kind of point is that? I mean, sin and...

Same to you. But seriously, let's both tone it down. A lot. To you. I get it. I could say the same thing to you. Let's tone it down. Okay well I am now. Let's tone it down. Again, a lot. Let's try to get back on good terms. Deal? I told you why I did... to just put an end to all the...

Eternity, SI, is the age to come. Come on, you know that. It's not a different... dimension, or something. Is that what you're saying? LOL! Maybe my reading comprehension skills are not so poor... LOL! It's not a rapture. It's most assuredly a rapturous event, but it's not a rapture in...

Good. But you did say, SI, "Perhaps you can show me where it says that Matthew 25:31-46 takes place on the earth? I would allow that it could take place on the new (renewed) earth, but you believe it will take place right on this earth as we know it without it first being burned up and...

No, I have plenty of answers, and have been very patient in explaining them. I've left nothing unanswered and am happy to continue with anyone if they are willing to keep it congenial, civil, and, well, not taunting or mocking. As for mine, again, the taunting/mocking was for a specific...

Oh, yes it can, SI. Yes it can. He didn't specify who he thought responsible for the "nonsense," so without that little tidbit of info, the receiver of the message could easily take what he said either way. He quoted my GIFs, which, yes, in a sense was nonsense... but in another not so much...

A post like that can easily be read either way. I thought he was implying that you were posting nonsense. Which you were. Over and over and over and over and over... <smile> You keep walking into these things... <smile> I think WPM is kind of a Johnny-Come-Lately to this particular...

Okay, well it was unclear. Well in my case, I was tired of trying to reason with him, because he had long since ceased to be conversational, and I was having to repeat myself over and over and over, because of the same objections time and time again, so, I was trying to drive him away, which at...

Well, that makes me wonder a bit why he's liking my posts and posting in response to me, "I agree." LOL! No, he responded to me, saying, "When people bring this nonsense to the table you normally know they've lost the debate." He's clearly talking about you; you may want to retract your...

Just a brief comment on this: You did, regarding the planet, no less. You said you believed it would be "burned up and renewed." Now, if you meant that in a different sense from what you apparently do, then I would agree. But... well, okay: Of the final Judgment, you said ~ and I don't...

LOL! I'm pretty sure he's talking about you, @Spiritual Israelite . Hoo boy. Grace and peace to all.

Well, I like your connection of "rule" and "shepherding." But is Jesus not our Good Shepherd even 2000 years ago... and still right now? As He said in John 10? I mean, He is... And He is reigning... in this present "thousand years," the millennium of Revelation 20, the same period referred...

This is... so close... but not quite right, WPM. You would classify yourself as amillennial, right? Or not? Anyway, I say that, well, what I think you're referring to in Revelation 2, 12, and 19 are pictures of the same time period as Revelation 20:1-6, and though it is not called the...

I laughed again. Out loud. Grace and peace to you, David.

Right. Erroneously. When you back up what you say with a passage from Scripture that actually does back up what you say, then that will be enough. But don't bother, because you won't find one. Well, you can't convince me of your "truth of the matter," because it's very much not the truth of...

I laughed. Out loud. Really loudly. For an extended amount of time. LOL! Grace and peace to you, David.

Right, because I chose not to, because doing so would have been ridiculous. Nope. You used no Scripture to back up anything other than Genesis 8:21 and Genesis 9:11-14. Nor did I; that's irrelevant, as we're just discussing the two and... disagreeing regarding how the two "mesh." I say how...

Nope. On a personal level, God promised Noah that he would never again cut off all flesh with the waters of the flood, never again would there be a flood to destroy the earth. But in His heart, even previous to that, He resolved to Himself to never again curse the ground because of man or ever...