Search results

Yea, exactly! He cannot address that. He just ducks around it.

Premils wrongly divide up the fate of Satan, his demons and the beast into an array of disjointed and unconnected events, which are in truth the same overall ongoing experience. This is absurd because their fortune is carefully and inextricably tied together by association, interdependence and...

Angels are spirits (Hebrews 1:14). Demons are fallen angels. They operate in the invisible realm. Their allegiance is to Satan. When the Bible talks about the activity of the devil, it sometimes includes the phrase “and his angels.” Satan is a distinct entity from his demons, but you cannot...

Exactly. It is delusional. Look at how many posts, Scriptures and arguments he is avoiding on this thread. He never does this when he is arguing truth. He knows he is fighting Scripture on this.

You!

More avoidance. What have you got to hide?

Again, you totally avoid the issues.

So they are all distinct from, and separate to, man?

Satan attacks those who are real and are a threat to him. What a deception of Satan to believe he and his demons are not real.

You avoided his main points, as people do when they are in error.

First of all, the king of Tyrus was still alive here when this was being spoken. Second, the king of Tyrus was definitely not in the Garden of Eden. That would have made him thousands of years old, which is ridiculous. Thirdly, the king of Tyrus was not an anointed guardian cherub. He was a...

So Satan is a real distinct entity distinct to man but demons are not?

They have no answer. That is why they have fled to the hills. It is frankly ridiculous.

Exactly. Anyone who is engaged in ministry or active Christianity will be aware that Satan and his demons are real evil entities desiring to control, possess, oppress or depress whoever.

One is talking about a future physical resurrection, the other is talking about Paul's death 2000 years ago, and where his spirit would go.

You miss my point, which you cannot refute. You are making something of words that are not in the Greek, just like you invented an unbiblical illustration to try and support your teaching. You are clearly manipulating Scripture to support your error.

There is no "to be" in 2 Corinthians 5:8. That is put there by the translators. You build your argument upon aded words. 2 Corinthians 5:8 literally reads: "absent [Gr. ekdeemeesai] from the body, and present [Gr. endeemeesai] with the Lord."

Like I thought! That seems to sum up your theology. It is not based on hard Scripture.

1st of all, which Scripture are you quoting: "Jesus would be born and die"?

I have zero interest in your links to your false prophetess or any of her false teaching?